TherapistsTwo physical therapists (A.L.T. and N.W.G.) participated in the examination and treatment of all participants in this study. Both therapists were board certified in orthopaedic physical therapy. One therapist was a faculty member and a graduate of a long-term, in-residence, American Physical Therapy Association-accredited manual therapy fellowship, and the other provider was a fellow in training in the same program. The fellow in training and the faculty member, respectively, had 5 years and 14 years of clinical experience.
ExaminationAll participants with knee OA provided age, height, weight, pain location and severity, duration of symptoms, and medication usage. They also completed a standard medical history screening and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index includes pain, function, and stiffness subscales. The participants with normal knees provided age, height, weight, and medication usage and completed a standard medical history screening questionnaire. The participants with normal knees were matched to those with knee OA by age, sex, and BMI. Once demographic data were collected, knee extension angle and end-range joint stiffness of the most symptomatic lower extremity were assessed in the participants with OA. The corresponding right or left limb was assessed in the matched participant.
InstrumentationPrevious studies that have attempted to quantify joint motion and stiffness in individuals with knee OA have utilized a pendulum test 7,41 previously developed to assess spasticity in patients with neurological conditions. One limitation of the pendulum test is that it measures midrange rotational stiffness, which may limit its clinical applicability to individuals with knee OA, who typically demonstrate a loss of end-range movement. 14,27,29,39 In addition, manual therapy assessment and treatment decisions are typically based on end-range motion or stiffness, as decreased terminal knee flexion or extension theoretically has the greatest impact on function. Therefore, videofluoroscopy was utilized to capture motion at the end range of extension, as it is considered by many to be the gold standard for measuring osteokinematic movement. 24,32,33 Each participant underwent 3 imaging sessions within the same day. The laboratory temperature was kept consistent for all imaging sessions and all participants. Data from the first imaging session were recorded as the baseline measurements. Manual therapy intervention was performed between imaging sessions 1 and 2 (posttreatment measurement). Immediately following imaging session 2, the participant walked around the measurement apparatus and then underwent a third imaging session to establish the reliability of the measurements.To obtain each image, the participant was placed in the supine position within the imaging apparatus, as shown in FIGURES 2 and 3. The limb to be imaged was placed on an apparatus inclined at 45° and secured to the board with...