2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation, Thoracic Imaging, and Children: Radiation Safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9-15 Investigators have emphasized that the radiation risk from a single imaging modality can be high. 3,7,8,10,13,15 However, children with complex heart diseases are often exposed to repetitive imaging. 16 According to current guidelines from the International Committee on Radiation Protection (ICRP), stochastic exposure risks (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9-15 Investigators have emphasized that the radiation risk from a single imaging modality can be high. 3,7,8,10,13,15 However, children with complex heart diseases are often exposed to repetitive imaging. 16 According to current guidelines from the International Committee on Radiation Protection (ICRP), stochastic exposure risks (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It exposes patients to ionizing radiation, and ill children with suspected pneumonia may receive multiple CXRs, posing a small increased risk of cancer later in life. [2][3][4] Lung ultrasonography (LUS) has several potential advantages over CXR. Compared with CXR, LUS does not expose the child to ionizing radiation, when used to address specific diagnostic questions requires minimal training for the provider, and can be performed at the point of care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lungs has slowly evolved technically over the past 30 years to improve imaging of the pulmonary parenchyma and has progressed tremendously in the past decade. Although several strategies are available to optimize dose reduction, clinicians should always weigh the potential future risks against the short-term benefits when evaluating patients with bronchiectasis.…”
Section: Imaging Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%