2010
DOI: 10.3171/2010.7.focus10124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation treatment strategies for acromegaly

Abstract: The high morbidity and mortality associated with acromegaly can be addressed with multiple treatment modalities, including surgery, medicines, and radiation therapy. Radiation was initially delivered through conventional fractionated radiotherapy, which targets a wide area over many treatment sessions and has been shown to induce remission in 50%–60% of patients with acromegaly. However, conventional fractionated radiotherapy takes several years to achieve remission in patients with acromegaly and carr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None received primary radiotherapy. In contrast to surgery and pharmacotherapy, radiotherapy has delayed effects, with several years being needed to achieve disease control [25,39]. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy achieves a biochemical remission in 35–75% of patients, usually after 10 years [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None received primary radiotherapy. In contrast to surgery and pharmacotherapy, radiotherapy has delayed effects, with several years being needed to achieve disease control [25,39]. Conventional fractionated radiotherapy achieves a biochemical remission in 35–75% of patients, usually after 10 years [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the remission rate following gamma knife radiosurgery based on MET-PET findings tended to be higher than that based on MRI findings. Furthermore, the time to remission is shorter with MET-PET-based dose planning for radiosurgery compared with MRI-based dose planning [11][12][13][14]. Because of the small number of patients and the size of the residual tumor [15] differed between patients, we cannot reach a conclusion on the superiority of either method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In terms of gamma knife adjuvant therapy, the sequential changes in IGF-1 after gamma knife radiosurgery differ between MRI-based dose planning (Figure 4) [11][12][13] and MET-PET-based dose planning ( Figure 1). Notably, the remission rate following gamma knife radiosurgery based on MET-PET findings tended to be higher than that based on MRI findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, no compelling evidence to support this. Loss of pituitary function after either therapy is usually limited to 1 or 2 pituitary functions, rather than panhypopituitarism, and it occurs over several years, accumulating for 10-15 years after treatment, as summarized in the current issue in reports by Stapleton et al 8 and Yang et al 9 Because with radiosurgery we have access to very few studies with follow-up durations beyond 5 years (see the tables in the reports by Rowland et al, 7 Stapleton et al, 8 and Yang et al 9 ), the true incidence of adverse effects on pituitary function over time cannot be known until the data to measure it are available. For instance, in the only radiosurgery series with a minimum median follow-up of 10 years, 6 46% of patients with acromegaly who underwent radiosurgery had endocrine remission at 10 years and 50% developed new anterior pituitary insufficiencies, the majority of which appeared more than 5 years after treatment.…”
Section: Radiosurgery Versus Fractionated Radiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%