2002
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation Use Efficiency and Biomass Production in Soybean at Different Plant Population Densities

Abstract: As population density (POP) increases in a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] crop, maximum light interception (LI) occurs earlier in the season. Earlier canopy closure would be expected to increase the cumulative radiation intercepted. We hypothesized that if radiation use efficiency (RUE) was constant across a range of population densities in a nonstressful environment, then increasing POP would increase biomass at the end of the season. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the response of total biomass produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
63
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the inconsistencies between the current and previous studies would be attributed to the narrow range of planting density (12.8 and 18.5 plants m −2 in current study in comparison to the wide range (7 to 135 plants m −2 ) in Purcell et al (2002). Considering the RUE decrease with increasing planting densities was about .002 g MJ plant −1 (Purcell et al, 2002), the difference of planting density (ca. 6 plants m −2 ) in this study is too narrow to assess the difference of RUE having the standard error about .08 (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for the inconsistencies between the current and previous studies would be attributed to the narrow range of planting density (12.8 and 18.5 plants m −2 in current study in comparison to the wide range (7 to 135 plants m −2 ) in Purcell et al (2002). Considering the RUE decrease with increasing planting densities was about .002 g MJ plant −1 (Purcell et al, 2002), the difference of planting density (ca. 6 plants m −2 ) in this study is too narrow to assess the difference of RUE having the standard error about .08 (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Achieving complete ground cover by the R1 stage or shortly thereafter is required to achieve maximum yield (Andrade et al, 2002;Ball et al, 2000;Board, 2000;Lee et al, 2008;Purcell et al, 2002). The light interception in our experiment reached 80% about 1 week after R1 in 2014 and around R1 in 2015, and reached 90% at 10 d after R1 in 2014 and 2-6 d after R1 in 2015 (Tables 1 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increase of density to a certain extent in determinate area is an important way to achieve higher seed yield (Liu et al, 2008). However, excessive high density resulted in decrease of radiation use efficiency and hence the increase reached yield ceiling (Purcell et al, 2002). Under light-enriched treatment condition, the appropriate density for a certain soybean cultivar will increase and crop yield components also will change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%