1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3107(67)90089-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative capture cross sections for 3 MeV neutrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined uncertainties from both the statistical and the systematic errors are 4.2 − 7.6% for the 115 In(n,γ) 116m In reaction cross section. Table 2 shows that the 115 In(n,γ) 116m In reaction cross sections at the neutron energies of 1.12, 2.12, 3.12 and 4.12 MeV are the re-determined values and are found to be in good agreement with the literature data [14,25,27,28]. The present data at the neutron energy of 1.12 MeV is in agreement with the data of Peto et al [14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The combined uncertainties from both the statistical and the systematic errors are 4.2 − 7.6% for the 115 In(n,γ) 116m In reaction cross section. Table 2 shows that the 115 In(n,γ) 116m In reaction cross sections at the neutron energies of 1.12, 2.12, 3.12 and 4.12 MeV are the re-determined values and are found to be in good agreement with the literature data [14,25,27,28]. The present data at the neutron energy of 1.12 MeV is in agreement with the data of Peto et al [14].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Table 2 shows that the 115 In(n,γ) 116m In reaction cross sections at the neutron energies of 1.12, 2.12, 3.12 and 4.12 MeV are the re-determined values and are found to be in good agreement with the literature data [14,25,27,28]. The present data at the neutron energy of 1.12 MeV is in agreement with the data of Peto et al [14]. Similarly, for the neutron energies of 2.12, 3.12 and 4.12 MeV, the present data are in agreement with the data of Andersson et al [25,28] but lower than the values of Husain and Hunt [27].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results for the 65 Cu(n,γ) 66 Cu reaction are shown in Fig. 6 in comparison with the previously existing data [11,17,[22][23][24][25][26] and the ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.b5 evaluations [5], and the TENDL-2014 [6] calculation. Our data are higher in magnitude than the previous data below E n = 5 MeV, but agree well with the existing data above this energy.…”
Section: Data-analysis Procedures and Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Theoretical calculations have been performed with the TALYS-1.2 code [15]. A literature survey revealed four papers [16][17][18][19] detailing experiments on the cross section of the 159 Tb(n, γ )Tb 160 reaction. Experimental data obtained in this work are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results Of Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%