2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiative rates for E1, E2, M1, and M2 transitions in Br-like ions with43Z50

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find a systematic offset in the AMBiT 4p 4 4d energy levels compared to experiment of 2100(900) cm −1 , which originates from the relaxation of the 4p orbitals in the different configurations and is not completely accounted for by the CI and MBPT approach. Our overall relative accuracy is ∼0.3%, which compares favorably with the previous theory 2.6% [32]; cf. Table III.…”
Section: Ambitsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We find a systematic offset in the AMBiT 4p 4 4d energy levels compared to experiment of 2100(900) cm −1 , which originates from the relaxation of the 4p orbitals in the different configurations and is not completely accounted for by the CI and MBPT approach. Our overall relative accuracy is ∼0.3%, which compares favorably with the previous theory 2.6% [32]; cf. Table III.…”
Section: Ambitsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The gA ratio using HFR standard scaling, before any fitting, is however 1.8 (2.2 × 10 12 /1.2 × 10 12 ), not too distinct from a value of 0.7 obtained from FAC calculations. It is also similar to a GRASP calculation indicating a ratio of 1.2 [32,57]. Table II, and in addition the Cowan results from the fit to experimental data are listed.…”
Section: Spectrum Of Sn 15+supporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations