2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiator and floor heating operative temperature and temperature variation corrections for EN 15316-2 heat emission standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason is that the above functions are not linear in a, b, c: since the view factors are additive, a more correct way to calculate them with formulas (A1) and (A2) consists of subtracting F p−A i at a = h from F p−A i at a = h + 15cm. This way one obtains a net view factor, which despite not being 100% accurate, returns physical operative temperatures that match earlier results [24,36] and the present numerical simulations (see e.g. Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason is that the above functions are not linear in a, b, c: since the view factors are additive, a more correct way to calculate them with formulas (A1) and (A2) consists of subtracting F p−A i at a = h from F p−A i at a = h + 15cm. This way one obtains a net view factor, which despite not being 100% accurate, returns physical operative temperatures that match earlier results [24,36] and the present numerical simulations (see e.g. Figs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…in [36] that the energy demand is very sensitive to operative temperature corrections. In particular, a difference of only 0.1°C can increase the annual heating need by 1-2% [36]: such effect is found for both the convector and the 21-type panel radiator, which are therefore fairly underperforming.…”
Section: Figure 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that the above functions are not linear in a, b, c: since the view factors are additive, a more correct way to calculate them with formulas (A1) and (A2) consists of subtracting F p−A i at a = h from F p−A i at a = h + 15cm. This way one obtains a net view factor, which despite not being 100% accurate, returns physical operative temperatures that match earlier results [20,24] and the present numerical simulations (see e.g. Figs.…”
Section: Appendix View Factors and Operative Temperature Formulassupporting
confidence: 88%
“…approaches the air temperature is very advantageous for energy saving, as it was shown e.g. in [24] that the energy demand is very sensitive to operative temperature corrections. In particular, a difference of only 0.1°C is capable of inducing an increase of the annual heating need by 1-2% [24]: such effect is found for the convector and 21-type panel radiator, which are therefore fairly underperforming.…”
Section: Figure 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23] authors proved that low temperature heating systems result in better thermal comfort compared to the other available on the market. Authors in [24] state that using the operative temperature, as it is not yet implemented in the prEN ISO 15316-2:2014 methodology for calculation of losses generated by heating and domestic hot water production, instead of the air temperature will create a difference in losses incurred in the generation subsystem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%