2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42438-020-00196-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical Flexibility and Relationality as Responses to Education in Times of Crisis

Abstract: As educational institutions negotiate numerous challenges resulting from the current pandemic, many are beginning to wonder what the future of education may look like. We contribute to this conversation by arguing for flexible education and considering how it can support better—more equitable, just, accessible, empowering, imaginative—educational futures. At a time of historical disorder and uncertainty, we argue that what we need is a sort of radical flexibility as a way to create life-sustaining education, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence the new concept of "viral modernity", an example of "bio-informationalism", which applies to "viral technologies, codes and ecosystems in information systems, publication, education and emerging knowledge" [ 2 ]. In this unstable environment, Veletsianos & Houlden [ 3 ] maintain the need for a flexible education (teaching and learning anywhere, anytime) that promotes a more just, accessible, autonomous, and creative system. Flexible education, so that it does not become a discriminatory option, must be compatible with socio-constructivist pedagogical approaches such as cooperative learning, learning communities, networked learning or peer learning, supporting students by considering their individual characteristics and the context in which they are developed [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the new concept of "viral modernity", an example of "bio-informationalism", which applies to "viral technologies, codes and ecosystems in information systems, publication, education and emerging knowledge" [ 2 ]. In this unstable environment, Veletsianos & Houlden [ 3 ] maintain the need for a flexible education (teaching and learning anywhere, anytime) that promotes a more just, accessible, autonomous, and creative system. Flexible education, so that it does not become a discriminatory option, must be compatible with socio-constructivist pedagogical approaches such as cooperative learning, learning communities, networked learning or peer learning, supporting students by considering their individual characteristics and the context in which they are developed [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one of these, Whittle et al (2020) engaged K‐12 teachers and professional instructional designers through a participatory design methodology, intending to provide an educational framework that considers factors such as multiple subject areas, school districts, learner ages and socio‐economic situations when designing unplanned or responsive remote teaching solutions. In a similar vein, radical flexibility and relationality are suggested as ways to create sustainable education for all and for the future: flexible education needs to be equitable, just, accessible, empowering and imaginative (Veletsianos & Houlden, 2020). Indications for flexibility and change are also provided by proposals that suggest fostering active learning, community building and civic participation in an emergency through the use of social media in combination with conventional LMS (Greenhow & Chapman, 2020), or supporting students’ affective, behavioural and cognitive engagement by leveraging the school community (Borup et al, 2020).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another implication of this finding, supported by Ann Ewing's findings ( 2021), is that the effectiveness of online teaching is still largely based on face-to-face teaching techniques. Effective online teaching is not only intended to serve as an optional or alternative environment for traditional face-to-face activities; rather it aims to offer radical flexibility (Veletsianos and Houlden, 2020). The analysis of the third question reveals four key factors contributing to the ineffectiveness of online teaching: (a) technological constraints, (b) learners' unpreparedness, (c) teachers' technophobia and (d) health issues.…”
Section: Findings and Implications For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a shift also emphasizes the importance of teachers 'acceptance of different modes of teaching as well as their readiness for the environments within which they are asked to teach. As no education programme can fully prepare the teaching staff for unanticipated demands and challenges (Jensen et al, 2010), teachers may be in need of motivating flexible programmes to help them leave their comfort zones and better prepare their students for 21 st century skills and competencies (Veletsianos and Houlden, 2020). Despite extensive research on the effectiveness of teaching in the traditional classroom (Seidel and Shavelson, 2007), limited literature exists on what makes teaching effective outside it (Rasmussen, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%