“…In view of the insertion/extraction of the larger Na + (ion radius: Na + ∼ 0.102 nm vs. Li + ∼ 0.076 nm), conventional rigid inorganic cathode materials directly being used in SIBs still suffer from low capacity, poor cyclability, sluggish kinetics, and even serious phase transition. , In contrast, organic cathode materials have more competitive advantages to inorganic materials for SIBs in many aspects, such as relatively weak intermolecular interactions, flexibility, low-cost, renewable resources, and tunable molecular structure. − However, organic cathodes still face many challenges, such as dissolution in organic electrolytes for small molecular organic materials − as well as low electrical conductivity, ,, leading to fast capacity decay, inefficient utilization of active materials and unsatisfactory rate performance. A two-bird-one-stone strategy is to integrate redox-active polymers into conductive carbon substrates, − such as in situ polymerization of poly(pyrene-4,5,9,10-tetraone) (PPTO) on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) to construct PPTO–CNTs composites, in situ electropolymerization of 4,4′,4’’-tris(carbazol-9-yl)-triphenylamine (TCTA), quinone-rich polydopamine (PDA) coating on 3D porous carbon surface, and radical polymer poly(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl-4-yl methacrylate) (PTMA) grafting graphene sheets (rGO) composites . Meanwhile, for organic polymer active materials, many researches also paid their attention to decrease the particle size of the polymer , or add massive conductive carbon materials to improve the material utilization and the electronic conductivity .…”