“…James, 1983J. James, , 1984, including women's scripts (M. James, 1973;Wyckoff, 1971), and lesbian identity (Johnson, 2004) � Applying TA to nations in terms of structural (ego state) analysis, international transactions, and national positions, scripts, and games (Orten, 1973) � Applying game theory to organisations and identifying political games (Poindexter, 1975) � Applying TA (especially script theory) to racism (Batts, 1982(Batts, , 1983 � Contracting for peace (Roberts, 1974) � Analysing the Master-Slave relationship (English, 1987;Jacobs, 1991) � Analysing the contribution and potential of TA psychotherapy in enhancing citizenship (Tudor & Hargaden, 2002) � Developing a social matrix of globalisation using ego state theory (Mihailovic & Mihailovic, 2004) � Viewing the political arena as a source of learning for leadership (van Peolje, 2004) � Questioning how relational TA concepts (Summers & Tudor, 2000) can address and challenge oppressive dynamics (see Rowland, 2016) � Offering a transactional analysis of war and peace using TA proper and game analysis (Campos, 2014) � Applying the concept of mystification to politics (Minikin, 2018) Notwithstanding the caution of applying theory founded in individual psychology to the wider social/political world (see Karakashian, 1974;Rogers, 1959; and 3.2 above), these analyses have merit. Furthermore, some TSTAs, especially those in the organisational field, have been developing field-specific theory, that is, an analysis of organisations, their pulsations (Mohr, 2006), imago (Suriyaprakash & Mohanraj, 2006), and roles (Schmid, 2008), based on organisational analysis, a strategy which, I suggest, perhaps points the way to a more politically informed TA of politics that may even become another field of application of TA as has been suggested by Mohr (personal communication, 28th June 2020).…”