2007
DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30124-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the inferior level of the mouth

Abstract: The SND may be used for SCC of the lower level of the mouth.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the characteristics of lips SCC is the extension of the tumor, which can manifest either towards the surface, in depth or in both directions. For instance, the occult metastases rates of a T2 stage lip cancer were reported in 15% to 35% of cases [17]. In such cases, elective neck dissection with excision of the primary tumor is the treatment of choice [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the characteristics of lips SCC is the extension of the tumor, which can manifest either towards the surface, in depth or in both directions. For instance, the occult metastases rates of a T2 stage lip cancer were reported in 15% to 35% of cases [17]. In such cases, elective neck dissection with excision of the primary tumor is the treatment of choice [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound can detect lymph nodes but not metastases. Therefore, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the most advisable option to diagnose metastases in the neck lymph nodes, especially in patients with N0 [17], and it may help in the treatment of these patients [19]. SLNB, as one of the procedures, is standard care for melanoma [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible reason for the high surgical complication rates in this study is the kind of neck dissection performed. As shown in the supplementary section, the majority of the patients received a radical neck dissection instead of a modified radical neck dissection, which seems to be of sufficient oncologic safety in many clinical situations (Rapoport et al , ; Patel et al , ; Shepard et al , ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%