2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radicalisation and individual differences: Disinhibition, boldness and meanness as predictors of support for radical collective action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a considerable body of research points to personality as a distal antecedent of collective action (e.g., Besta et al, 2021;Mondak et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Dual Nature Of Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, a considerable body of research points to personality as a distal antecedent of collective action (e.g., Besta et al, 2021;Mondak et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Dual Nature Of Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been acknowledged that protest participation operates in “packages”—rather than fighting for a single cause, people tend to engage in collective action related to multiple (albeit connected) issues (e.g., Andersen & Jennings, 2010; Louis et al, 2016). Moreover, a considerable body of research points to personality as a distal antecedent of collective action (e.g., Besta et al, 2021; Mondak et al, 2010).…”
Section: The Dual Nature Of Collective Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This not only reflects medical professionals’ frustration but also offers a unique opportunity for empirical analyses. For example, it could be examined who engages in striking and collective action and what effects it has on their job satisfaction or intention [ 80 ].…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychopathy is subject to a rich, multidisciplinary research tradition (Boddy et al, 2010; Landay et al, 2019) that features a range of conceptions, including Cleckleyan psychopathy (i.e., the psychopath's bold, disinhibited behavior and feckless disregard) and criminal psychopathy (i.e., meaner, more aggressive behavior; Skeem et al, 2011). Despite these differing conceptions, psychopathy is most commonly measured by Hare's (1991) Psychopathy Checklist, Revised (PCL‐R; e.g., Cooke & Michie, 1997), where those scoring high on this trait tend to display the following attributes (Marcus et al, 2013): (1) boldness : low fear, including through an elevated tolerance to stress, unfamiliar situations, and danger, coupled with high self‐confidence and social assertiveness; (2) disinhibition : poor impulse control, including through a limited ability to plan or assess the consequences of their actions, an urge to control situations, a demand for immediate gratification, and impaired behavioral restraints, and (iii) meanness : lacking empathy, remorse, and attachment to others, leading them to adopt cruelty for self‐empowerment, defiance of authority, and destructive thrill‐seeking (Besta et al, 2021). We next review management/marketing‐based SE research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%