2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002270000394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio-acoustic positioning as a tool for studying site-specific behavior of the white shark and other large marine species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is currently admitted that intraperitoneal implantation of a transmitter is presumably an adequate tagging procedure for studying fish behaviour (Eristhee and Oxenford, 2001;Lowry and Suthers, 1998;Klimley et al, 2001;Paukert et al, 2001). Moreover, in our study, SCUBA diving observations suggest that the behaviour described does not originate from tagging artefacts and that a few hours after release, tagged fish reintegrated a school and rapidly adopted similar behaviour to the rest of the group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It is currently admitted that intraperitoneal implantation of a transmitter is presumably an adequate tagging procedure for studying fish behaviour (Eristhee and Oxenford, 2001;Lowry and Suthers, 1998;Klimley et al, 2001;Paukert et al, 2001). Moreover, in our study, SCUBA diving observations suggest that the behaviour described does not originate from tagging artefacts and that a few hours after release, tagged fish reintegrated a school and rapidly adopted similar behaviour to the rest of the group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Upon their return to the coast, acoustically tagged white sharks were routinely detected by receivers at a number of central California locations. Four of these listening stations accounted for a disproportionately high number of detections during the coastal aggregation phase, revealing a preference for a limited number of key hotspots (figure 5 supplementary material, methods S1) of the stationary receivers suggested near-constant patrolling (Goldman & Anderson 1999;Klimley et al 2001) at these key locations over residence periods extending from days to months (maximum ¼ 107 days and minimum ¼ 1; figure 5 and electronic supplementary material, figure S4). These residency periods were punctuated at times by relatively rapid transits to the other monitored sites, away from the original tagging location (mean transit rate ¼ 38.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The position of each transmitter was calculated every 2-5 min and was accurate to AE 1-3 m while within the central portion of buoy array (O'Dor et al 1998). (A complete description of the tracking system can be found in Klimley et al 2001;Golet et al 2006. )…”
Section: Tracking Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%