2013
DOI: 10.1017/pas.2012.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio Continuum Surveys with Square Kilometre Array Pathfinders

Abstract: In the lead-up to the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) project, several next-generation radio telescopes and upgrades are already being built around the world. These include APERTIF (The Netherlands), ASKAP (Australia), e-MERLIN

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 457 publications
(669 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are sufficient to detect radio-bright X-ray sources, although the majority of the X-ray source population is ≈ 1-2 orders of magnitude fainter than the sensitivity of NVSS and FIRST. However, substantially deeper radio surveys are now being undertaken over > ∼ 1,000 deg 2 and many aim to cover the majority of the visible sky (e.g., at low < ∼ 200 MHz frequencies: GMRT-TGSS; LOFAR; MWA; at mid ≈ 1 GHz frequencies: Apertif-WODAN; ASKAP-EMU; MeerKAT-MIGHTEE; VLA-VLASS; see Norris et al 2011Norris et al , 2013Lazio et al 2014 for a recent summary). Many of these surveys are pre-cursors and pathfinders to the Square Kilometer Array (SKA; e.g., Dewdney et al 2009;Carilli 2014), an international project to build the world's largest radio telescope, planned to start operations over the next ≈ 10-20 yr.…”
Section: Infrared-radio Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are sufficient to detect radio-bright X-ray sources, although the majority of the X-ray source population is ≈ 1-2 orders of magnitude fainter than the sensitivity of NVSS and FIRST. However, substantially deeper radio surveys are now being undertaken over > ∼ 1,000 deg 2 and many aim to cover the majority of the visible sky (e.g., at low < ∼ 200 MHz frequencies: GMRT-TGSS; LOFAR; MWA; at mid ≈ 1 GHz frequencies: Apertif-WODAN; ASKAP-EMU; MeerKAT-MIGHTEE; VLA-VLASS; see Norris et al 2011Norris et al , 2013Lazio et al 2014 for a recent summary). Many of these surveys are pre-cursors and pathfinders to the Square Kilometer Array (SKA; e.g., Dewdney et al 2009;Carilli 2014), an international project to build the world's largest radio telescope, planned to start operations over the next ≈ 10-20 yr.…”
Section: Infrared-radio Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, radio surveys over large areas but with shallower depth and/or lower angular resolution than the 3 GHz COSMOS data (we recall that we have  0. 75 resolution and 2.3 μJy rms at 3 GHz, equivalent to 4.3 μJy at 1.4 GHz for a = 0.8) like the EMU survey with ASKAP at 1.4 GHz, LOFAR low frequency surveys, and even MIGHTEE from MeerKAT-see details in Norris et al (2013) for all of these-would be substantially less efficient in finding > z 2.5-3 clusters. ALMA interferometric imaging (Figure 1 and Table 1) will provide efficient screening of radio-selected high-z cluster candidates, confirming the high galaxy SFRs and their distances (the radio to submillimeter flux ratio is a rough redshift indicator; Carilli & Yun 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The black line represents the formula proposed by Condon (2002) which is reported together with the fitted relation in the bottom left corner. We also plot in magenta the expected sensitivity of different surveys: the SKA1-MID all-sky, wide, deep, and ultra-deep surveys (Prandoni & Seymour 2015), the WSRT Apertif survey (Norris et al 2013), the ASKAP MIGHTEE survey (Jarvis et al 2016), the ASKAP EMU survey (Norris et al 2011), and the VLA VLASS (Lacy et al 2016).…”
Section: The Confusion Limit In Total Intensity Q and U Stokes Paramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been fitted with the relations reported in the bottom left corner of the plot. We also plot in magenta the expected sensitivity of different surveys: the all-sky, wide, deep, and ultra-deep SKA1-MID surveys (Prandoni & Seymour 2015), the WSRT Apertif survey (Norris et al 2013), the ASKAP MIGHTEE survey (Jarvis et al 2016), the ASKAP POSSUM (Gaensler et al 2010) surveys.…”
Section: The Confusion Limit In Total Intensity Q and U Stokes Paramentioning
confidence: 99%