2004
DOI: 10.14429/dbit.24.4.3631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio Detection System for Information Handling

Abstract: In near future, libraries will operate with such simplicity that staff will receive pre-sorted materials for shelving. Shelves will be instantly scanned for setting in some specific order. Library users will be able to check materials in and out of the library all by themselves without a librarian processing them and would find what they want almost instantly without bothering for classification system or arrangement. All this will leave library staff with more time to give personal attention to the user that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some newer installations even allow books to be delivered automatically, via conveyor from a storage system, to the requesting patron waiting at a kiosk. While some critics state that this reduced handling time may lead to staff reductions, it could also lead to staff redeployment to having more interaction with patrons (Kern, 2004, p. 320; Mehta et al , 2004, p. 19; Scire, 2003, p. 52). An RFID deployment can also help a library deal with an increasing volume of circulation (Schaper, 2005, p. 6).…”
Section: Arguments For and Against Rfid Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some newer installations even allow books to be delivered automatically, via conveyor from a storage system, to the requesting patron waiting at a kiosk. While some critics state that this reduced handling time may lead to staff reductions, it could also lead to staff redeployment to having more interaction with patrons (Kern, 2004, p. 320; Mehta et al , 2004, p. 19; Scire, 2003, p. 52). An RFID deployment can also help a library deal with an increasing volume of circulation (Schaper, 2005, p. 6).…”
Section: Arguments For and Against Rfid Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%