2014 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccchina.2014.7008395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radio resource scheduling using packet-level service differentiation for video over the LTE downlink

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The others are simply some sort of combination of and and thus both channel-aware and QoS-aware with a tight real-time delay budget [9], say at 150 ms for conversational video communication, meaning that any headof-line packet delay larger than this budget will trigger the removal of that head-of-line packet from its transmit queue and thus save some radio resources. In our previous study [7], the superiority of the proposed GLWDF scheduling metric over EXPPF and MLWDF [10] has been demonstrated based on the EPL scheme, which was introduced as the power term of and make possible differential scheduling among packets of a single video flow, not achievable by any other conventional scheme. Hence, as a validation scenario for the proposed RGI scheme in this study, the power term of GLWDF will serve as a basic framework for designing an improved GLWDF-like scheduling metric to validate RGI's superiority over both the I/P and EPL schemes, and thus the power term EPL will be replaced by the RGI or I/P scheme for performance evaluation.…”
Section: B Lte Scheduling Metrics For Radio Resource Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The others are simply some sort of combination of and and thus both channel-aware and QoS-aware with a tight real-time delay budget [9], say at 150 ms for conversational video communication, meaning that any headof-line packet delay larger than this budget will trigger the removal of that head-of-line packet from its transmit queue and thus save some radio resources. In our previous study [7], the superiority of the proposed GLWDF scheduling metric over EXPPF and MLWDF [10] has been demonstrated based on the EPL scheme, which was introduced as the power term of and make possible differential scheduling among packets of a single video flow, not achievable by any other conventional scheme. Hence, as a validation scenario for the proposed RGI scheme in this study, the power term of GLWDF will serve as a basic framework for designing an improved GLWDF-like scheduling metric to validate RGI's superiority over both the I/P and EPL schemes, and thus the power term EPL will be replaced by the RGI or I/P scheme for performance evaluation.…”
Section: B Lte Scheduling Metrics For Radio Resource Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network resource allocation issue for applying RGI can thus be pinned down to be the packet scheduling problem of radio resource blocks (RBs) of the LTE base station (eNodeB). Many fundamental details of LTE have been described in [5][6][7], and the following highlights the relevant concepts for scheduling the RBs of eNodeB among multiple user equipments (UEs). Fig.…”
Section: B Lte Scheduling Metrics For Radio Resource Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metric used to select real time flows considers the head of a line packet delay and the metric for non-real time flows is the one of the PF [9]. In [10], the author proposes a scheduling algorithm for the LTE downlink aiming to improve the delay and the throughput of the users in the system. The GLWDF (Generalized Largest Weighted Delay First) scheduler algorithm is an improvement over the conventional MLWDF scheduler algorithm.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Requirements like Voice over LTE (VoLTE) and audio/video streaming impose their own real-time performance requirements which have to be handled to provide proper user experience. A radio resource scheduling algorithm for video streaming is discussed in [1]. It proposes a packetlevel service differentiation to improve the throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%