Radio-Ulnar Pronation vs Forearm Extension: Which the Best to Reach the Maximal Badminton Racket Velocity?

Abstract

Aim. Forearm extension and radio-ulnar pronation are two common components of the final movement during each badminton smash stroke. By coordinating the forearm to produce both extension and pronation at the same time, racket head velocity can be increased. Thus, this study examined maximal velocity and racket deflection during both movements in regard with skill level. Materials and methods. Twenty-two players (8 experts and 14 novices) participated in this study. Wrist, handle and racket head velocity were recorded using high speed cameras (Vicon V8i at a frequency of 250 Hz). Results. The racket head velocity with radio-ulnar pronation was 16 % higher than with forearm extension. This higher velocity resulted from an 8 % higher acceleration and a 70 % higher maximal angular velocity of the end points of the forearm segments during radio-ulnar pronation. In each movement, experts’ maximal velocity was higher than that of novices (p < .001).The maximal velocity of the racket for novices was obtained with elbow extension (20.9 ± 4.8 m/s), with a gain of 47 %, whereas for experts, it was obtained with radio-ulnar pronation (33.9 ± 5.8 m/s), with a gain of 53 %. Conclusion. The difference between the best velocities in both samples is 39 %, obtained respectively by radio-ulnar pronation for experts and an elbow extension for novices. Forearm extension and radio-ulnar pronation acceleration on the handle led to an increase in racket head velocity.

Badminton Guidance Teaching in the Background of Big Data

“…Against this background, if teachers evaluate students' badminton learning effect according to a single goal, it will eliminate the enthusiasm and limitation of students with poor foundation to a certain extent, and promote the popularization and of badminton education [6]. For badminton students, on the other hand, badminton as a part of the subject, China's development in the field of competitive badminton has been in a "demand-driven" development model for a long time, many teachers are eager to achieve certain results in the classroom [7]. Excessive pursuit, ignoring the low level of students, also affect the overall scientific of badminton education in universities [8].…”