2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioactivity measurements and dosimetric evaluation in meat of wild and bred animals in central Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 5 shows the comparison of the results obtained with other reports, the mean values of 226 Ra in beef are higher than that those reported values , in Egypt, in United States, in Korea and in Taiwan 14,[27][28][29] . In this study, the average value of 40 K in beef is lower than the values reported in Korea by Choi et al (2008), in Nigeria by Akinloye et al (1999) and in Italy by Meli et al (2013), while our obtained value is higher than the value reported by Harb et al (2010) in Egypt 14,28,30,31 . Similarly, 40 K concentrations in milk were higher than concentration in milk from other countries 13,14,28,32,33 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Table 5 shows the comparison of the results obtained with other reports, the mean values of 226 Ra in beef are higher than that those reported values , in Egypt, in United States, in Korea and in Taiwan 14,[27][28][29] . In this study, the average value of 40 K in beef is lower than the values reported in Korea by Choi et al (2008), in Nigeria by Akinloye et al (1999) and in Italy by Meli et al (2013), while our obtained value is higher than the value reported by Harb et al (2010) in Egypt 14,28,30,31 . Similarly, 40 K concentrations in milk were higher than concentration in milk from other countries 13,14,28,32,33 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Thus, humans consuming pig muscle tissue (pork) will be exposed to lowered concentrations of radionuclides than actually ingested by the pig simply because the radionuclides accumulated in the bone. Recent research published by Meli et al (2013) figure 1 represents the chart of activity concentration of radionuclides in samples. Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of radionuclide transfer from grass to animal products are shown in Table 4 Due to the lack of data on natural radionuclides in local meat and milk, we compared our results data from other sources and established that they are reasonably similar (40)(41)(42). Also, they are below the internationally maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination in foodstuffs and below or similar to the proposed safe values of radionuclides in food and feed (43).…”
Section: Radiological Effect On Workers and General Populationmentioning
confidence: 88%