Estimation of the Time Since Death 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815731-2.00009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon and amino acid racemization (AAR) and the time since death

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 108 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also refers to the lesser known immunological methods, such as gel diffusion testing (by detecting residual serological activity), analysis of lipid content, histological tests (to analyze the state of decomposition), ion exchange chromatography, and colourimetry. Widely used in archaeological contexts, radiocarbon has also been investigated during the last decades [18,19], although in many countries like Portugal, it only serves to exclude archaeological remains. Likewise, the UV-induced fluorescence test may only be used to exclude historical material rather than for estimating the PMI [10]; radionuclide analysis is extremely expensive and requires elaborate handling [20]; and luminol assays should not be used as the sole method due to the high chance of getting false positives [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also refers to the lesser known immunological methods, such as gel diffusion testing (by detecting residual serological activity), analysis of lipid content, histological tests (to analyze the state of decomposition), ion exchange chromatography, and colourimetry. Widely used in archaeological contexts, radiocarbon has also been investigated during the last decades [18,19], although in many countries like Portugal, it only serves to exclude archaeological remains. Likewise, the UV-induced fluorescence test may only be used to exclude historical material rather than for estimating the PMI [10]; radionuclide analysis is extremely expensive and requires elaborate handling [20]; and luminol assays should not be used as the sole method due to the high chance of getting false positives [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%