2010
DOI: 10.1126/science.1189395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt

Abstract: The historical chronologies for dynastic Egypt are based on reign lengths inferred from written and archaeological evidence. These floating chronologies are linked to the absolute calendar by a few ancient astronomical observations, which remain a source of debate. We used 211 radiocarbon measurements made on samples from short-lived plants, together with a Bayesian model incorporating historical information on reign lengths, to produce a chronology for dynastic Egypt. A small offset (19 radiocarbon years olde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
65
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies of the dating of the Egyptian Old to New Kingdoms have demonstrated that historical dates and 14 C-derived dates are compatible where reliable samples are selected and the correct methodologies applied [2][4]. The consistency of the results relating to the Thera eruption demonstrates the importance of a range of different sample types, although ideally they would have had chronological depth as well as geographical breadth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies of the dating of the Egyptian Old to New Kingdoms have demonstrated that historical dates and 14 C-derived dates are compatible where reliable samples are selected and the correct methodologies applied [2][4]. The consistency of the results relating to the Thera eruption demonstrates the importance of a range of different sample types, although ideally they would have had chronological depth as well as geographical breadth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collapse at the end of the Neopalatial period-defined as Middle Minoan III until the end of Late Minoan IB, perhaps some 250 years to c. 1450 BC (but see Bruins 2010;Dickinson in press;Manning 2010;Manning et al 2006;Ramsey et al 2010)-is identified by the end of a palace-based culture that used Linear A script and the integrated islandwide system that had developed over time (Davis 2008;Manning 2008;Schoep 2010;Tomkins and Schoep 2010), perhaps with some form of Knossian pre-eminence (Bevan 2010). This was accompanied by widespread but selective destruction by fire, abandonments, deurbanization, and possible depopulation (Hallager 2010, p. 153).…”
Section: Palatial (Minoan) Cretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Levant, the Canaanite coastal cities were prospering through trade from Egypt to Mesopotamia, and Canaan was the sphere of interest of the Egyptian and Hittite empires [25]. In Egypt, the New Kingdom was at its height during the prosperous reign of Seti I (first regnal year: 1307–1296 cal yr BC; historical date 1295–1279 BC) and Ramses II (first regnal year: 1292–1281 cal yr BC; historical date 1279–1213 BC) [26]–[27]. However, around 1200 BC, at the end of the LBA, the Eastern Mediterranean civilization declined or collapsed 20,28–33.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%