2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10512-006-0120-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioecological state of the territory and water area in Guba Andreev

Abstract: The radioecological conditions which developed on the territory over the long operating time of the object of the naval fleet in Guba Andreev are described. The results of an analysis of the sources of the real and potential danger and measures to prevent dangerous effects for the environment and the workers at the time remediation work is performed are discussed.The buildings and structures at a temporary disposal site for spent nuclear fuel and radioactive wastes in Guba Andreev (a former technical shore bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The leak took place close to the bottom of the welded metal shell on the border of the old storage facility (built in 1962) and new storage facility (1972)(1973)(1974). The rate of leakage at its peak reached 30 tons per day (specific activity of water 7 was A ud ∼3.7•10 7 Bq l −1 ). Water leaking from the basins in Building 5 was radioactive because, under operational rules in the 1970s, it was permitted to drain water into those basins that had become radioactively contaminated after contact with spent fuel assemblies (SFAs), including examples of contact with damaged assemblies.…”
Section: Former Snf Storage Facility (Building 5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The leak took place close to the bottom of the welded metal shell on the border of the old storage facility (built in 1962) and new storage facility (1972)(1973)(1974). The rate of leakage at its peak reached 30 tons per day (specific activity of water 7 was A ud ∼3.7•10 7 Bq l −1 ). Water leaking from the basins in Building 5 was radioactive because, under operational rules in the 1970s, it was permitted to drain water into those basins that had become radioactively contaminated after contact with spent fuel assemblies (SFAs), including examples of contact with damaged assemblies.…”
Section: Former Snf Storage Facility (Building 5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 1.3•10 17 6.0•10 14 3.7•10 13 6.5•10 11 a The estimate is given for 137 Cs; the short-lived radionuclides were not taken into account. 7 The original measurements were recorded in mCi/l and have been converted to Bq/l.…”
Section: Former Snf Storage Facility (Building 5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The examination of the natural media in the shore strip and water area was started in 2003. Aside from the conventional sampling methods, the radioactivity of the water and bottom deposits was measured with a REM-10 high-sensitivity underwater spectrometer with a detector based on a 200 × 200 mm NaI(Tl) crystal, previously used for radiation examination of the sunken submarines Komsomolets, Kursk, and B-159 [3][4][5]. This spectrometer made it possible to measure in 1000 sec the concentration of technogenic radionuclides, specifically, 137 Cs at the 100 Bq/m 3 level in water and 10 Bq/kg in bottom deposits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) in order to continue comprehensive investigation of radiologically dangerous waters and sunken objects. The design took account of the experience gained in surveying the sunken nuclear submarines Komsomolets, Kursk, and B-159 and coastal waters near the shore bases of the fleet in Gremikha and Guba Andreeva [5]. The gamma-spectrometers in the complex have a unified electronic part, making it possible to perform measurements in the autonomous regime (the spectrometers can be positioned as a station performing long-term monitoring of the radiation environment for up to 1 yr) as well as in a real-time regime using a cable along which spectrometric information is immediately transmitted to the operator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%