2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioelements and heat production of an exposed Archaean crustal cross-section, Dharwar craton, south India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The natural crustal cross-section inferred for the Dharwar craton shows that the *400 km long and 30-50 km wide Closepet Granite batholith, is exposed in a crustal cross section of *15 km from greenschist facies crustal level in the north through amphibolite-to-granulite facies transition in the south (2.5-7 kbar). Extensive measurements of radioelemental abundances (K, U and Th) over the batholith confirm a strong variation in heat production in the granitoid from greenschist facies crustal level (average, 4.9 lW m -3 ) to granulite facies crustal level (average 1 lW m -3 ) (Kumar and Reddy 2004). However, no heat flow data were available to examine the relationship between heat flow and heat production in the batholith, except at one site close to the margin with migmatitic gneiss (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The natural crustal cross-section inferred for the Dharwar craton shows that the *400 km long and 30-50 km wide Closepet Granite batholith, is exposed in a crustal cross section of *15 km from greenschist facies crustal level in the north through amphibolite-to-granulite facies transition in the south (2.5-7 kbar). Extensive measurements of radioelemental abundances (K, U and Th) over the batholith confirm a strong variation in heat production in the granitoid from greenschist facies crustal level (average, 4.9 lW m -3 ) to granulite facies crustal level (average 1 lW m -3 ) (Kumar and Reddy 2004). However, no heat flow data were available to examine the relationship between heat flow and heat production in the batholith, except at one site close to the margin with migmatitic gneiss (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This leads us to believe that the EDC was hotter than many other shield regions of the world in the mid-Proterozoic period when kimberlites intruded the craton. This can be attributed, following the present-day heat flow model of Senthil Kumar and Reddy (2004), to high mantle heat flow beneath the EDC in the mid-Proterozoic time.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this has not been the case. In many geological situations, it has been found that the measured heat production is considerably higher than normally assumed, at least till about mid-crustal level, for example, Vredefort granitic basement of Kaapvaal craton (Nicolaysen et al, 1981), central southern Alps region of the South Island, New Zealand (Pandey, 1981) and Archean Dharwar crust of India (Senthil Kumar and Reddy, 2004). Such midcrustal enrichment has been explained by lithology-related variations in heat producing elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present day exposed crustal configuration comprises four metamorphic facies layers, green schist, amphibolites, metasomatized granulite and depleted granulites. Heat production vs. depth distribution has been studied in detail for the Closepet granitic batholithic region (Senthil Kumar and Reddy, 2004) situated in the central part of the craton which itself exposes almost 12 km deep section corresponding to palaeo-depth between 8 and 20 km. To this data, we have added, the recently acquired heat production data pertaining to sub-surface mid-crustal amphibolite-granulite facies rocks from Killari region (Maharashtra, India) belonging to similar terrain, and lower crustal granulitic heat production data from the Southern granulite terrain of south India (Ray et al, 2003).…”
Section: Dharwar Craton (Southern India)mentioning
confidence: 99%