“…However, it has been associated with serious complications (e.g., perforation, fistulas, and strictures), and the efficacy is limited in patients with active bleeding, extensive disease and distally located lesions (anorectal junction) [2, 4]. RFA covers a broader area, has a superficial depth of ablation (0.5–1 mm), reducing the potential risk for fibrosis and stricture formation [2, 3], and has emerged as a promising alternative treatment [1]. According to Rustagi et al [1], who published the largest series of patients managed by RFA ( n = 39), this technique showed 96% improvement of the endoscopic severity score, 100% efficacy in stopping bleeding, and 92% of blood transfusion discontinuation, with no major complications [1].…”