Radiofrequency: Thermage

Polder, Kristel D.; Bruce, Suzanne

doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2011.04.006

Cited by 29 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These systems where more superficial layers are targeted for applications to the face and neck are also used in body shaping. The dermis is the primary target for face and neck applications but deeper tissues are targeted to affect subcutaneous fat tissue in body shaping (7,14). Monopolar, unipolar, multipolar and fractional RF systems according to the number of electrodes used are currently available together with a large number of devices using these systems (16).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, it has been reported in recent years that a second session performed about two months after the first one could increase treatment effectiveness (7,16,23). These effects have been suggested to continue for an average of 18 to 36 months depending on the natural aging process of the person and the environmental factors (7,14). Repeating the monopolar RF applications two years later on is usually recommended and there is no obstacle to a surgical procedure.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Repeating the monopolar RF applications two years later on is usually recommended and there is no obstacle to a surgical procedure. RF can also be combined with most of the other non-invasive procedures (7,24).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency in middle and lower face laxity

Gökalp¹

2017

J Turgut Ozal Med Cent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: In recent years, radiofrequency (RF) systems have become one of the most commonly used rejuvenation methods, especially in the skin of the mid-lower face. In this study, the efficacy of monopolar RF energy in mid-lower face skin sagging was evaluated. Material and Methods: A total of 42 patients between the ages of 34 and 67 were included in this study. All patients underwent monopolar RF and were followed for 6 months. The monopolar RF energy level was determined based on the maximum level that each patient could tolerate. Patients were photographed with a digital camera before and 6 months after the procedure. The sagging grade of the mid-lower face before and after treatment was determined using the Merz skin laxity scale (MSLS). According to the MSLS, the level of laxity was divided into 5 groups: none, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. The patient satisfaction levels were grouped into the following categories: not satisfied, minimally, well, and perfectly satisfied. Patients were monitored for side effects. Results: After the RF treatment, the mean MSLS score decreased from 2.60±0.80 to 1.86±0.87. The decrease in skin laxity after treatment was statistically significant (p=0.0001173). Patient satisfaction was correlated with treatment response (p=3.7x10-7). Erythema and edema were observed in all 42 patients; two patients complained of fat tissue reduction. Conclusion: Monopolar RF is an effective method for treating mid-lower face skin laxity. However, RF energy applied at high energy parameters may lead to thinning in the subcutaneous fat layer.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency in middle and lower face laxity

Gökalp¹

2017

J Turgut Ozal Med Cent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Frontal, left, right, and oblique (left and right) views should be taken at baseline (before treatment). These can be taken at 3 months' follow-up and at 6 months' follow-up to document response to treatment [10].…”

Section: Patient Selection and Periprocedural Preparationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monopolar Radiofrequency

Osley

Ross

Saedi³

2014

Radiofrequency in Cosmetic Dermatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiofrequency (RF) was first applied to aesthetic uses as monopolar RF. In its monopolar form, RF is applied to the target area by means of a dedicated handpiece, while a grounding pad is applied to the body at a distance. This differs from the mode of unipolar RF, in which a single electrode with no return is applied to the skin; the distinction between these two modalities is discussed in detail in the chapter 'Unipolar Radiofrequency'. The entry of RF into the body at the site of contact with the active electrode leads to bulk tissue heating, which can be provided at a depth. This ability to heat a volume of tissue noninvasively is applied to skin tightening on the face and body, as the heat induces both immediate collagen contraction and delayed collagen synthesis, by thermal induction of fibroblasts. Cumulative experience with monopolar RF has led to better, more reproducible, and better-tolerated results as treatment protocols and devices have evolved. Monopolar RF has a firm place as a safe and popular technology in the aesthetic armamentarium.Nonablative radiofrequency (NARF) devices find their place in dermatology for the purpose of skin tightening as they readily target the deeper tissues of the dermis and induce collagen remodeling. They have gained particular popularity because of their ability to offer improvement of lax and/or photodamaged skin without the postoperative morbidity and financial burden of surgical procedures. Compared to more invasive alternatives, the results of NARF are modest; however, it remains in demand secondary to its lower side effect profile and remarkably short postprocedural downtime. This continuing shift away from ablative and invasive aesthetic procedures continues to be driven largely by patient and clinician preferences [1].Monopolar radiofrequency (RF) is a nonsurgical approach to skin tightening and photorejuvenation. The FDA first cleared its use for treatment of periorbital rhytids in 2002. Additional clearances were given for tightening of the lower face in 2004 and for skin tightening on the body in 2005. The first device, Thermage ThermaCool (Sol-

show abstract

“…23.2). 2 TNRF can be delivered using monopolar, unipolar, bipolar, or newer multipolar devices (▶ Table 23.1). 3 Monopolar RF instruments require the patient to be grounded and are more deeply penetrating because the current follows the path of least resistance through the skin and deeper tissues and out through the grounding pad.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

23 Radiofrequency Skin Tightening

Truswell¹

2016

Lasers and Light, Peels and Abrasions

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Radiofrequency: Thermage

Cited by 29 publications

References 29 publications

Efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency in middle and lower face laxity

Efficacy of monopolar radiofrequency in middle and lower face laxity

Monopolar Radiofrequency

23 Radiofrequency Skin Tightening

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About