2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000252200.66545.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic Assessment of Lumbar Facet Distance Spacing and Spondylolysis

Abstract: Spondylolytic fractures at L5 are influenced by an inadequate increase in interfacet distances between adjacent vertebrae. Individuals lacking sufficient increase in lower lumbar transverse interfacet dimensions are at greater risk of developing and maintaining spondylolytic defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results corroborate previous tests of the hypothesis comparing spondylolytic and unaffected individuals from bones (Ward and Latimer, 2005) and clinical radiographs from adult (Ward et al, 2007) and pediatric (Zehnder et al, 2009) patient populations. These differences in interfacet distance between spondylolytic and unaffected individuals are not a reflection of differential increase in vertebral body size, as patterns are equivalent when interfacet distance is standardized by body diameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results corroborate previous tests of the hypothesis comparing spondylolytic and unaffected individuals from bones (Ward and Latimer, 2005) and clinical radiographs from adult (Ward et al, 2007) and pediatric (Zehnder et al, 2009) patient populations. These differences in interfacet distance between spondylolytic and unaffected individuals are not a reflection of differential increase in vertebral body size, as patterns are equivalent when interfacet distance is standardized by body diameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…3 and 4). Unaffected spines show a greater differential increase in interfacet distance than spondylolytic ones at this lowest level, as seen in the Hamann Todd (Ward and Latimer, 2005) and clinical (Ward et al, 2007;Zehnder et al, 2009) populations. No different pattern is seen in BD (Table 2; Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plain radiographs have shown poor sensitivity in detecting pars defects, and subsequent imaging is usually necessary in order to make the diagnosis [16]. Single positron emission computerized tomography (SPECT), CT and MRI are imaging studies which have all been used in conjunction with plain radiograph, and controversy exists over which diagnostic modality is most sensitive and specific for diagnosing spondylolysis.…”
Section: Radiographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ward et al described an inadequate increase in the transverse interfacetal distance progressing caudally from L4 to S1, compared with normal control subjects, was found in the individuals with spondylolysis of L5. The inferior articular process of L4 and the superior articular process of S1 contact the same cross-sectional position of the L5 pars interarticularis in accordance with the reduction in the transverse interfacetal distance, so excessive pressure was applied on the isthmus due to pinching between the inferior articular process of the segment above and the superior articular process of the segment below, thus leading to bony resorption and bone weakness, finally resulting in lysis [20]. In the analysis of cadaveric skeletons with L5 spondylolysis, Masharawi et al noted that greater degrees of coronal orientation, facet tropism and symmetry of the lower lumbar facets was With elongation strongly associated with spondylolysis, and with increased contact surface area of the opposing articular processes because of coronally oriented facet joints: they postulated that more loading stress was being applied to the isthmus during flexion and extension.…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%