2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic classification of osteoarthritis in commonly affected joints of the foot

Abstract: Radiographic features of OA in commonly affected foot joints can be documented with high levels of agreement within examiners and moderate levels of agreement between examiners. Provided single examiners or consensus gradings are used, the atlas appears to be a useful tool to assist in the standardization of foot OA assessment for epidemiological and clinical studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
207
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
207
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Intrarater reliability for the presence of OA was found to be excellent. Despite interrater reliability being moderate, it was comparable with the original atlas 5. Although the study population had a prevalence of OA in 1 or more foot joints of 63%, when multiple foot joints were examined the numbers in some of the combinations were quite small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Intrarater reliability for the presence of OA was found to be excellent. Despite interrater reliability being moderate, it was comparable with the original atlas 5. Although the study population had a prevalence of OA in 1 or more foot joints of 63%, when multiple foot joints were examined the numbers in some of the combinations were quite small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…A single experienced reader (MM), who had undergone a period of training, scored 5 joints in each foot (first MTP joint, first and second CM joints, NC joint, and TN joint) for osteophytes and JSN (range 0–3) according to a published atlas 5. The joints examined were selected based on their inclusion in the published radiographic foot atlas, which had determined that they were the most commonly affected, clearly visible on dorsoplantar and lateral views, and could be reliably scored 5. Sixty randomly selected radiographs were rescored after 8 weeks (by MM) to assess intrarater reliability and were scored by a second experienced reader (HBM) to determine interrater reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 The atlas consists of standardized dorso-plantar and lateral radiographs of commonly affected joints of the foot. For each joint, the presence of osteophytes was graded as absent (score ¼ 0), small (score ¼ 1), moderate (score ¼ 2) or severe (score ¼ 3), and presence of joint space narrowing was graded as none (score ¼ 0), definite (score ¼ 1), severe (score ¼ 2), or joint fusion of at least one point (score ¼ 3).…”
Section: Radiographic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of first MPJ OA using this atlas has been shown to have high test-retest and interexaminer reliability. 17 Assessment of First MPJ Motion First MPJ dorsiflexion was measured using a goniometer with participants in a seated position. The hallux was passively dorsiflexed to its end point range of motion with the amount of motion documented in degrees.…”
Section: Radiographic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%