1989
DOI: 10.1002/hed.2880110505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic evaluation for nasal dysfunction: Computed tomography versus plain films

Abstract: Sixty-two patients, presenting to the Nasal Dysfunction Clinic at the University of California, San Diego, were radiographically examined with plain sinus x-rays and computed tomographic (CT) scans. The x-rays were evaluated independently, and the reported findings were compared. In maxillary sinuses the CT and plain film observations corresponded poorly with a concordance of 77%. There was a tendency to overread the plain films. In the ethmoid sinuses the lack of concordance between CT scans and plain films w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common nasal neoplasms were lymphoma (5) and squamous cell carcinoma (3). Other tumor types included nasal adenocarcinoma (2), poorly differentiated sarcoma (2), osteosarcoma (2), and undifferentiated carcinoma (1). All cats in the non-neoplasia group had rhinitis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common nasal neoplasms were lymphoma (5) and squamous cell carcinoma (3). Other tumor types included nasal adenocarcinoma (2), poorly differentiated sarcoma (2), osteosarcoma (2), and undifferentiated carcinoma (1). All cats in the non-neoplasia group had rhinitis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiography in the evaluation of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses has significant limitations because of superimposition of structures. [1][2][3] Furthermore, in dogs and cats radiographic features of nasal neoplasia are often indistinguishable from chronic rhinitis. [4][5][6][7][8] Radiographic opacification of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses, and osteolysis of turbinates, and/or paranasal bones can be seen with both conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 However, sinus radiographs are less sensitive than CT imaging of the sinuses. 201 In a prospective study, routine CT sinus scanning was no better than an ENT examination in accurately identifying upper airway disease as a cause of the cough. 55…”
Section: Published Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Both these two technological advances in imaging modalities provide greater detail and about the anatomic extent of disease. Plain radiography has limited value for imaging paranasal sinuses, especially the ethmoid sinuses and the ostiomeatal complex and its use is not indicated [4][5].…”
Section: Int J Adv Res 5(2) 1515-1521mentioning
confidence: 99%