2005
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200510000-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic Methods for the Assessment of Polyethylene Wear After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
54
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
54
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our radiological evaluation did not reveal any implant dislocations as a consequence of excessive external forces and we were not able to note any radiological macroscopic signs of UHMWPE-wear on conventional X-ray images. However, well-established methods for measurement of polythylene wear after total hip replacement such as computer assisted edge-detection techniques or even radiostereometric analysis are still lacking for lumbar disc replacements and were thus not available in this study [44]. Persisting concerns regarding the future of the implant therefore remain a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our radiological evaluation did not reveal any implant dislocations as a consequence of excessive external forces and we were not able to note any radiological macroscopic signs of UHMWPE-wear on conventional X-ray images. However, well-established methods for measurement of polythylene wear after total hip replacement such as computer assisted edge-detection techniques or even radiostereometric analysis are still lacking for lumbar disc replacements and were thus not available in this study [44]. Persisting concerns regarding the future of the implant therefore remain a matter of debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 105 sets of radiographs evaluated, 102 sets of hip radiographs were acceptable for wear measurements (inclusion rate of 97%). Two-dimensional wear analysis was performed using the method of Martell et al, a semiautomated, computerized, edge detection method [19,[25][26][27]29]. Each reading of linear wear (femoral head penetration) was expressed as a magnitude (millimeters) and a rate (millimeters per year) for each of the femoral head sizes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of UHMWPE wear particles elicits an inflammatory reaction that is associated with periprosthetic bone resorption and implant failure [8,9,14,15,18,25,28]. The rate at which wear particles are generated, along with their size and volume are important factors in determining the likely occurrence of osteolysis [18,23]. Dumbleton et al in a review of the literature suggested osteolysis is infrequent with a wear rate less than 0.1 mm/year and almost absent at a rate less than 0.05 mm/ year [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ebramzadeh et al showed that the PolyWare method has a tendency to overestimate the amount of wear by 0.18 mm [10]. Although RSA is an extremely precise method for wear analysis [4,19], its use has been limited by its expense, its requirement for prospective assessment, and the expertise required for analysis [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%