2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01001-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
30
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Semiquantitative analysis was assessed through morphological standard MR sequences using a modified whole-organ magnetic resonance score (WORMS) [27]. This modified score included the evaluation of four articular compartments (medial and lateral femoral condyle, medial and lateral patella) and analysis of the following parameters: cartilage signal intensity and morphology, subchondral bone marrow oedema, subchondral cysts, synovitis/joint effusion [28]. To evaluate cartilage signal intensity and morphology, we used an eight-point scale as follows: 0 = normal thickness and signal intensity; 1 = normal thickness but increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images; 2 = focal and partial-thickness focal defect < 1 cm in greatest width; 2.5 = full-thickness focal defect < 1 cm in greatest width; 3 = multiple areas of partial-thickness (grade 2.0) defects intermixed with areas of normal thickness, or a grade 2.0 defect wider than 1 cm but < 75% of the region; 4 = diffuse (≥ 75% of the region) partial-thickness loss; 5 = multiple areas of full-thickness loss (grade 2.5) or a grade 2.5 lesion wider than 1 cm but < 75% of the region; 6 = diffuse (≥ 75% of the region) full-thickness loss.…”
Section: Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semiquantitative analysis was assessed through morphological standard MR sequences using a modified whole-organ magnetic resonance score (WORMS) [27]. This modified score included the evaluation of four articular compartments (medial and lateral femoral condyle, medial and lateral patella) and analysis of the following parameters: cartilage signal intensity and morphology, subchondral bone marrow oedema, subchondral cysts, synovitis/joint effusion [28]. To evaluate cartilage signal intensity and morphology, we used an eight-point scale as follows: 0 = normal thickness and signal intensity; 1 = normal thickness but increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images; 2 = focal and partial-thickness focal defect < 1 cm in greatest width; 2.5 = full-thickness focal defect < 1 cm in greatest width; 3 = multiple areas of partial-thickness (grade 2.0) defects intermixed with areas of normal thickness, or a grade 2.0 defect wider than 1 cm but < 75% of the region; 4 = diffuse (≥ 75% of the region) partial-thickness loss; 5 = multiple areas of full-thickness loss (grade 2.5) or a grade 2.5 lesion wider than 1 cm but < 75% of the region; 6 = diffuse (≥ 75% of the region) full-thickness loss.…”
Section: Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural joint damage and radiographic progression are reflected by an increased joint space narrowing [ 14 ]. Radiographic progression is described by the change of radiographic scoring between two time points and can be detected by different established scoring techniques [ 15 , 16 ] as well as the computer-aided quantification of finger JSW by CAJSA [ 7 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Эрозивный процесс считается отличительной чертой РА -наблюдается практически у 98% больных [10]. Для оценки прогрессирования заболевания, отражающего кумулятивный ущерб с течением времени, наиболее предпочтительным методом визуализации остается рентгенография [11]. Достоверные рентгенологические изменения рассматриваются как признак необратимого повреждения тканей сустава [10].…”
Section: особенности структурного прогрессированияunclassified