1975
DOI: 10.1136/sti.51.6.387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radioimmunoassay for quantifying antibody to N. Gonorrhoeae in human sera.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents a population with a prevalence of 100%. Similar results for an RIA were reported by Luoma et al (20), again in a preselected population of culture-positive and -negative sera.…”
Section: Downloaded Fromsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This represents a population with a prevalence of 100%. Similar results for an RIA were reported by Luoma et al (20), again in a preselected population of culture-positive and -negative sera.…”
Section: Downloaded Fromsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A variety of serological techniques have been described, including the complement fixation test (4,26), flocculation (18, 31), direct hemagglutination (9,19,32), and the indirect immunofluorescence test (2,34,35). Recently, a radioimmunoassay (1,21) and an indirect hemagglutination test (25) in which gonococcal pilus antigen is used to detect gonococcal antibodies have been described, but the results of these tests have been variable because of a lack of sufficient sensitivity or specificity. Except for the tests based on purified pili, the existing serological tests use either whole gonococci or chemically undefined extracts as antigens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M A N Y recent attempts to provide a serological diagnosis of gonorrhoea aim to detect antibodies by sensitive methods such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) (Buchanan et al, 1973;Luoma, Cross and Rudbach, 1975;Oates et al, 1977), or immunofluorescence (O'Reilly, Welch and Kellogg, 1973 ;Welch and O'Reilly, 1973;Wilkinson, 1975;Gaafar, 1976;Gaafar and d'Arcangelis, 1976). In general, diagnostic methods based on detection of antibodies have two disadvantages : delay before detectable levels of antibody are produced, and the persistence of antibodies from a past infection which may lead to disease being diagnosed when it is absent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%