Somatostatin Analogues 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781119031659.ch27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Receptor Antagonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 value) was determined to be 91 ± 7 nM (Figure ), while somatostatin-14 had a value of 8 ± 4 nM under the same experimental protocol. This SSTR binding affinity is lower than previously reported Re­(NSN)­(CO) 3 -sst 2 -ANT and Re­(NSO)­(CO) 3 -sst 2 -ANT (unpublished data) complexes by our group and the optimal IC 50 value of <30 nM described in the literature . Nevertheless, pharmacokinetics plays a dominant role in regards to tumor uptake in vivo .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50 value) was determined to be 91 ± 7 nM (Figure ), while somatostatin-14 had a value of 8 ± 4 nM under the same experimental protocol. This SSTR binding affinity is lower than previously reported Re­(NSN)­(CO) 3 -sst 2 -ANT and Re­(NSO)­(CO) 3 -sst 2 -ANT (unpublished data) complexes by our group and the optimal IC 50 value of <30 nM described in the literature . Nevertheless, pharmacokinetics plays a dominant role in regards to tumor uptake in vivo .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 58%