Radiologic follow-up of vena cava filter devices

Ll, Berland; Fe, Maddison; Bernhard, VM

doi:10.2214/ajr.134.5.1047

Cited by 48 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Significant filter tilt (>15°) has also been found to increase the rate of filter penetration. 17 Using a jugular approach for filter placement may lead to less filter tilt and consequently may reduce the risk of penetration. 18 Studies have also suggested that penetration rates are higher with smaller-caliber IVCs.…”

Section: -13mentioning

confidence: 99%

Caval Penetration by Inferior Vena Cava Filters

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background-Limited penetration into the caval wall is an important securing mechanism for inferior vena cava (IVC) filters; however, caval penetration can also cause unintentional complications. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, severity, clinical consequences, and management of filter penetration across a range of commercially available IVC filters. Methods and Results-The MEDLINE database was searched for all studies showed evidence of organ/structure involvement. Among patients with penetration, 8% were symptomatic, 45% were asymptomatic, and 47% had unknown symptomatology. The most frequently reported symptom was pain (77%, 108 of 140). Major complications were reported in 83 patients (5%). These complications required interventions including surgical removal of the IVC filter (n=63), endovascular stent placement or embolization (n=11), endovascular retrieval of the permanent filter (n=4), and percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral stent placement (n=3). Complications led to death in 2 patients. A total of 87% of patients (127 of 146) underwent premature filter retrieval or interventions for underlying symptoms or penetration-related complications. Conclusions-Caval penetration is a frequent but clinically underrecognized complication of IVC filter placement.Symptomatic patients accounted for nearly 1/10th of all penetrations; most of these cases had organ/structure involvement. Interventions with endovascular retrieval and surgery were required in most of these symptomatic patients.

show abstract

Section: -13mentioning

confidence: 99%

Caval Penetration by Inferior Vena Cava Filters

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While migration has been a concern, the distances are small, and clinically significant adverse outcomes are infrequent. Perforation of the IVC was seen in 14.5-24.2% of patients with the previous model of stainless steel Greenfield filters (14,25,26,29), in contrast to 0.6% with the present type filters (18,19,22,(30)(31)(32). We had no such complications, which is comparable to reports with the newfilter.…”

Section: Mortality and Complications During Ivc Filter Insertionmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…One is to prevent the development of DVTand the disengagement of thrombi, and secondly to use IVC filters to trap disengaged thrombi and thereby block their entry into the pulmonary circulation. In the USA, large-scale studies conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of filters indicated that the incidence of symptomatic PTE was lowered to 5% or less by the use of IVC filters (8,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). In these reports, however, neither the possible role of DVTas a source of thrombi nor the relationship of filter use to anticoagulation therapy were investigated.…”

Section: ) Mortality and Complications During Ivc Filter Insertionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-Term Results of Inferior Vena Cava Filters. Experiences in a Japanese Population.

et al. 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective In this prospective, non-controlled observational study, we evaluated the middle-to long-term results of placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter devices in Japanese patients.Methods and results In 42 Japanese patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) who underwent percutaneous insertion of IVC filters, follow-up examinations at fixed intervals of 2 years were performed, and the data was evaluated including complications. There were no fatal complications during IVC filter implantation. About 5 %of patients with an inserted IVC filter developed symptomatic PTE, another 5 %devel-oped asymptomatic PTE. The trapped thrombus was demonstrated in about 22%of the inserted IVC filters. Lower rates of PTEdevelopment, occlusion of IVC, and captured thrombuswere found in the cases whereconcurrent use of anticoagulation therapy with filters was used. Trapped thrombi were found in half of IVC filters inserted prophylactically for proximal femoral venous thrombosis.Conclusion These experiences with IVCfilters suggest that they are safe and effective for the prevention of PTEin the Japanese population.

show abstract

“…Numerous complications of filter placement have been reported, including caval thrombosis, caval penforation, and filter migration [1][2][3][4][5][6]. We have elected to use the Simon nitinol filter in most of our patients because of its small delivery system, ease of deployment, versatility, clottrapping efficiency, and low frequency of caval thrombosis and caval perforation [7,8].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%