2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2020.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological and clinical improvement in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonia postconvalescent plasma transfusion: A case report

Abstract: Currently, there are no approved specific antiviral agents for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Convalescent plasma has not yet been approved for use in patients with COVID-19 infection; however, it is regulated as an investigational product. This is a case report of a 55-year-old male, with COVID-19 pneumonia who has received convalescent plasma as part of a treatment plan which showed significant radiological and clinical improvement post-treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 2 weeks, she recovered and discharged. No AEs Al Helali AA et al [53] Abu Dhabi, UAE Case report 55y/M 300 ml 9 days Severe illness There was a significant radiological and clinical improvement in a few days’ post CPT. No significant AEs were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After 2 weeks, she recovered and discharged. No AEs Al Helali AA et al [53] Abu Dhabi, UAE Case report 55y/M 300 ml 9 days Severe illness There was a significant radiological and clinical improvement in a few days’ post CPT. No significant AEs were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Following removing duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts, we evaluated 153 articles in full text. Among these, we found 45 relevant articles (4RCTs, 11 controlled NRSIs, 7 non-controlled NRSIs and 23 case reports) [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] , [62] , [63] , [64] , [65] . Extracted details are presented in Table 1 (RCTs, controlled NRSIs, and non-controlled NRSIs) and table 2 (case report(series)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chest X-rays were obtained at admission on the ICU and after two days of treatment. Chest X-rays were evaluated using the CXR scoring system, which was specifically designed for semi-quantitative assessment of lung involvement in COVID-19 10,11 . In the CXR scoring system, six different lung zones are scored.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chest x-rays were obtained at admission to ICU and after two days of treatment. Chest x-rays were evaluated using the CXR scoring system, which was specifically designed for semi-quantitative assessment of lung involvement in COVID-19 [10,11]. In the CXR scoring system, six different lung zones are scored.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%