Radiological and Microbiological Evaluation of the Efficacy of Alveolar Bone Repair Using Autogenous Dentin Matrix—Preliminary Study

Abstract

Dental procedures for alveolar bone augmentation may be carried out using autologous bone graft material derived from the patient’s own tooth. The material obtained is subjected to strict procedures aimed at reducing the amount of bacteria in the autograft. The aim of this study was the evaluation of the efficacy of the autogenous dentine matrix produced by grinding the patient’s own tooth for the augmentation of maxillary bone defects and the evaluation of the microbiological status of the material obtained. Alveolar bone repair was performed with an autogenous dentin matrix in four patients. In each case, an autogenous bone graft substitute obtained by grinding the patient’s own tooth was used. The tooth-derived material was then used for alveolar augmentation. The obtained material was tested to assess its microbiological profile. For the purpose of comparison, other materials and tissues were also subjected to microbiological testing. Bone healing was assessed by CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) scanning before and 6 months after surgery using the Hounsfield scale and the ImageJ software. Analysis of the bone regeneration process based on the bone density score in Hounsfield units showed significant differences in measurements on CBCT scans carried out on the treatment site, before surgery, and 6 months after it, using ImageJ software. All bacteria detected in the bone augmentation material constituted the patient’s bacterial flora. The microorganisms present in the augmentation material were also present in the patient’s bone and soft tissues. The use of an autogenous dentin matrix for alveolar bone repair ensures that the proper volume is obtained and that alveolar bone shape is preserved and does not introduce pathogenic microorganisms into the patient. The procedure for preparing and using an autogenous dentin matrix is described based on one clinical case.

Advantages of Dynamic Navigation in Prosthetic Implant Treatment in Terms of the Clinical Evaluation and Salivary Pro-Inflammatory Biomarkers: A Clinical Study

“…The materials involved in bone augmentation can be classified as autogenous (grafts taken directly from the patient's tissues), allogenic (human bone material), xenogenic (derived from animals), or alloplastic (synthetic or natural provenance) [3]. Recently, an autogenous bone substitute extracted from the appropriately processed dentin of retained teeth has been successfully used to meet biological and physical criteria [4,5].…”