2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-020-00982-w
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological approach for the newly incorporated T staging factor, depth of invasion (DOI), of the oral tongue cancer in the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual: assessment of the necessity for elective neck dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 3b). These results are consistent with recent literature regarding ceMRI [13,20], probably due to [ 18 F]FDG accumulation in peritumoral inflammation, spill-over effects on PET images under limited resolution, and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images of the peritumoral edema. They suggest the need for T staging using T1-weighted MR images, especially in OTC patients with a shallow DOI of around 5 mm or less [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, 3b). These results are consistent with recent literature regarding ceMRI [13,20], probably due to [ 18 F]FDG accumulation in peritumoral inflammation, spill-over effects on PET images under limited resolution, and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images of the peritumoral edema. They suggest the need for T staging using T1-weighted MR images, especially in OTC patients with a shallow DOI of around 5 mm or less [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The radiological DOI was defined as the vertical distance between the deepest point of tumor infiltration and the simulated normal mucosal junction. According to the pathological DOI defined in the 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging system, the part above the mucosal surface was neglected for exogenous tumors, and the invaginated part was added for ulcerative tumors [12,13]. The radiological size and DOI were independently evaluated by two board-certificated radiologists/nuclear medicine physicians, and then consensus was reached by joint review and discussion.…”
Section: Image Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used MRI for cases with p-DOI > 3 mm, because 3 mm is an MRI cutoff value of detectable lesions. Similarly, Baba et al reported that the cutoff value of p-DOI for detectable lesion on MRI was 4 mm 25 . Therefore, the detection limit of p-DOI on the MRI is likely 3–4 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Third, we did not consider the shrinkage factor of fixation when comparing radiological/pathological measurements. It is well-established that the radiological DOI is larger than the pathological DOI because specimens shrink when fixed or if inflammation occurs [1,5,[31][32][33][34]. Furthermore, tumor sizes may change between CT, MRI, and surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%