2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02796-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological features of head and neck mammary analogue secretory carcinoma: 11 new cases with a systematic review of 29 cases reported in 28 publications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MASC was first described in 2010 as a rare salivary carcinoma mimicking acinar cell carcinoma and was released to the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumors in 2017[ 71 , 72 ]. MASC has morphological and genetic similarities with secretory carcinoma of the breast.…”
Section: Salivary Gland Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MASC was first described in 2010 as a rare salivary carcinoma mimicking acinar cell carcinoma and was released to the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumors in 2017[ 71 , 72 ]. MASC has morphological and genetic similarities with secretory carcinoma of the breast.…”
Section: Salivary Gland Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MASC has morphological and genetic similarities with secretory carcinoma of the breast. The majority of MASCs (approximately 70%-80%) are located in the parotid gland, while a smaller number are located in other minor salivary gland areas or major salivary gland glands[ 72 , 73 ]. MASCs are often tumors of “papillary and cystic” or “non-papillary and cystic” morphology.…”
Section: Salivary Gland Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Out of a total of 226 studies published between 2010 and 2023, identified at initial search and screened for retrieval, 112 1–3,6–114 articles were included in the study, with a total of 674 patients described in these articles. The identification and screening process is described in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed case-based studies using the widely accepted tool to evaluate the methodological quality of case reports and case series proposed by Murad et al, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] which is based on four domains (selection, ascertainment, causality, and reporting) and eight signaling questions.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%