2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological Infrabony Defects After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extractions in Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
15
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast Kugelberg et al proved in adolescents and adults, that the removal of impacted M3 has a beneficial effect on periodontal health (attachment and bone height) distal of M2 when there was a large angulation and close positional relationship of M3 to M2 (Kugelberg et al 1991a). These results are confirmed by Inocencio Faria et al who have shown a clinically and statistically significant bone healing 12 months after impacted mandibular M3 surgery (Inocencio Faria et al 2013). It can be considered that the surgical removal of M3 occurs with changes in alveolar bone height distal to the distal part of M2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast Kugelberg et al proved in adolescents and adults, that the removal of impacted M3 has a beneficial effect on periodontal health (attachment and bone height) distal of M2 when there was a large angulation and close positional relationship of M3 to M2 (Kugelberg et al 1991a). These results are confirmed by Inocencio Faria et al who have shown a clinically and statistically significant bone healing 12 months after impacted mandibular M3 surgery (Inocencio Faria et al 2013). It can be considered that the surgical removal of M3 occurs with changes in alveolar bone height distal to the distal part of M2.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…who have shown a clinically and statistically significant bone healing 12 months after impacted mandibular M3 surgery (Inocencio Faria et al. ). It can be considered that the surgical removal of M3 occurs with changes in alveolar bone height distal to the distal part of M2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited data suggest that following surgical removal of mandibular third molars, bone fill can be observed over a period of at least 12 months, with the most substantial change (e.g. most bone fill) occurring during the first 3 months after surgery (Inocêncio Faria et al., ). In a prospective clinical study including a total 26 extracted teeth, mean radiographic intra‐bony defect depth measured at baseline (e.g.…”
Section: Healing Of Bone Defects After Third Molar Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective clinical study including a total 26 extracted teeth, mean radiographic intra‐bony defect depth measured at baseline (e.g. immediately after third molar removal) 4.54 ± 1.87 mm and decreased to 1.78 ± 1.65 mm at 12 months, respectively (Inocêncio Faria et al., ). Bone healing was observed during the entire post‐operative period of 12 months, but the highest values occurred during the first 3 months amounting to 1.3 mm.…”
Section: Healing Of Bone Defects After Third Molar Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have claimed that a DBD of the M2M remains unchanged or improves [5][6][7] but several other studies have suggested that this condition worsens after M3M surgery [8]. The reason for this difference could be because of an unsatisfactory design of the clinical study [9,10] and/or limitations in periodontal-probing factors (pocket depth and attachment loss).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%