2016
DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2015-000017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological staging in pregnant patients with cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A digital bilateral mammography would also be an acceptable exam to be performed from the fetal radiation exposure perspective, because when associated with appropriate shielding, it has a fetal irradiation of approximately 0.004Gy, being the minimum value to induce negative effects to the fetus 100 mGy. 4,7 However, it is noteworthy that the higher the radiological density of the breast, the lower the sensitivity of the mammogram, therefore the choice of breast ultrasound on this study. 2,4 Due to the need for additional studies for the correct staging of the disease, aiming at the correct treatment planning, a breast magnetic resonance imaging was performed and three right-sided adenomegalies were found, suggesting local lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A digital bilateral mammography would also be an acceptable exam to be performed from the fetal radiation exposure perspective, because when associated with appropriate shielding, it has a fetal irradiation of approximately 0.004Gy, being the minimum value to induce negative effects to the fetus 100 mGy. 4,7 However, it is noteworthy that the higher the radiological density of the breast, the lower the sensitivity of the mammogram, therefore the choice of breast ultrasound on this study. 2,4 Due to the need for additional studies for the correct staging of the disease, aiming at the correct treatment planning, a breast magnetic resonance imaging was performed and three right-sided adenomegalies were found, suggesting local lymph node involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To date, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been shown to have any adverse effects on human fetus, confirmed by studies which followed until 9 years after fetal exposure. 7 The potential theoretical teratogenic effects of MRI result from the static magnetic field, which can potentially alter cell migration, proliferation and differentiation and the use of gadolinium which can cross the placenta. 4,7 However, the risk of an incorrect staging is greater than the potential damage to the fetus and can then be performed after the first trimester of pregnancy, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging modalities should be utilised with caution in any pregnant female wishing to carry their pregnancy to term, and a multidisciplinary discussion regarding a cancer staging workup should be considered. When determining imaging modalities for staging, safety of the foetus, likelihood of metastatic disease and the minimal radiation dose to achieve optimal staging accuracy should be considered [25]. With regard to ionising radiation, the concentration of foetal exposure may be 8–25 mGy with CT of the abdomen and pelvis, 0.01–0.66 mGy with CT of the chest and 1.1–9.04 mGy with FDG-PET [25, 26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as the modality of choice for acquisition of cross sectional imaging, as no studies to date have demonstrated adverse effects on the fetus from MRI (Figure 1) [5]. Gadolinium, which has been shown to have teratogenic effects in animal models, is not recommended for use during pregnancy [6].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential risks of fetal ionizing radiation exposure include risk of fetal death, induction of congenital malformations (including mental retardation) as well as carcinogenic potential for the unborn fetus[5]. There is no dose of ionizing radiation that is considered safe for a developing fetus, however at radiation exposures of less than 5 cGy, the fetus has a low risk of significant developmental abnormalities [8, 9].…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%