2013
DOI: 10.1057/hs.2013.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiology scheduling with consideration of patient characteristics to improve patient access to care and medical resource utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Cayirli, Veral and Rosen (2008) make simplifying assumptions that the no-show rates were identical for the two patient groups they study. Huang and Marcak (2013) do use decision trees for classification of patients. By doing so, they determine the slot length.…”
Section: (Ii) Simulation Modelling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Cayirli, Veral and Rosen (2008) make simplifying assumptions that the no-show rates were identical for the two patient groups they study. Huang and Marcak (2013) do use decision trees for classification of patients. By doing so, they determine the slot length.…”
Section: (Ii) Simulation Modelling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision trees are popular in the healthcare setting for their relative efficiency, computational ease, ease of interpretation, and visual appeal in terms of display. [27][28][29] A decision tree method is used to identify when the proposed method or the current ED practice should be used. The decision is generated using R software.…”
Section: Simulation Runs and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It impacts patient and medical staff productivity, stress, service quality and efficiency of medical care, as well as health-care cost and availability. Many appointment scheduling methods have been developed to undertake the problems with consideration of patient classifications [3][4][5][6], appointment demand uncertainty [7][8][9], urgent care [10][11][12], patient arrival patterns [13], service interruptions and physician lateness [14], walk-ins [15], ancillary services [16], and no-shows for effective overbooking [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. These considerations aim to provide a better appointment scheduling template by mainly determining the most appropriate appointment intervals in subject to an objective function that either maximizing profit [8,[24][25], minimizing patient and/or physician waiting [13-14, 16, 19, 26-28], or minimizing costs of patient waiting, physician idling and overtime [3, 10-11, 15, 17-18, 20-21, 29-30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%