2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08500-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiolytic degradation of anticancer drug capecitabine in aqueous solution: kinetics, reaction mechanism, and toxicity evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In what concerns the effects of CAP in the microalga R. subcapitata , the estimated EC 50 values [EC 50,72 h of 0.077 (0.025–0.129) mg L −1 and 0.630 (0.485–0.774) mg L −1 for yield and growth inhibition, respectively] are two or three orders of magnitude lower than the few ones reported in the literature, namely in a safety data sheet from the ABC Laboratories dating from 1997, which reported an EC 50,72 h of 58 mg L −1 concerning growth rate inhibition of these microalga, an EC 50,72 h of 200 mg L −1 for biomass/yield inhibition, and a NOEC value of 14 mg L −1 (Hoffmann-La and Ltd 2021 ). To the authors’ best knowledge, only one other similar toxicity record is described in the literature and it concerns a calculation based on ECOSAR class program, which estimated an EC 50 of 0.897 mg L −1 for green algae, which in turn resulted in the classification of CAP as “very toxic” to these organisms, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (Huo et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what concerns the effects of CAP in the microalga R. subcapitata , the estimated EC 50 values [EC 50,72 h of 0.077 (0.025–0.129) mg L −1 and 0.630 (0.485–0.774) mg L −1 for yield and growth inhibition, respectively] are two or three orders of magnitude lower than the few ones reported in the literature, namely in a safety data sheet from the ABC Laboratories dating from 1997, which reported an EC 50,72 h of 58 mg L −1 concerning growth rate inhibition of these microalga, an EC 50,72 h of 200 mg L −1 for biomass/yield inhibition, and a NOEC value of 14 mg L −1 (Hoffmann-La and Ltd 2021 ). To the authors’ best knowledge, only one other similar toxicity record is described in the literature and it concerns a calculation based on ECOSAR class program, which estimated an EC 50 of 0.897 mg L −1 for green algae, which in turn resulted in the classification of CAP as “very toxic” to these organisms, according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (Huo et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its pharmacokinetic properties show inter-individual variability; this may be attributed to the variation in enzyme activity (Deng et al, 2015). Capecitabine has estrogenic, cytotoxic, and teratogenic properties (Huo et al, 2020). Toxic adverse effects of capecitabine also include hair loss, myelosuppression, and gastrointestinal problems (Fernández et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these anticancer drugs are cytotoxic. Therefore, their presence in wastewater is a threat to aquatic ecosystems (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%