1988
DOI: 10.6028/jres.093.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric calibrations of portable sources in the vacuum ultraviolet

Abstract: The radiometric calibration program carried out by the vacuum ultraviolet radiometry group in the Atomic and Plasma Radiation Division of the National Bureau of Standards is presented in brief. Descriptions are given of the primary standards, which are the hydrogen arc and the blackbody line arc, and the secondary standards, which are the argon mini- and maxi-arcs and the deuterium arc lamp. The calibration methods involving both spectral radiance and irradiance are then discussed along with their uncertaintie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For calibration in absolute intensity an Optronics OL550 Tungsten ribbon lamp was used for wavelengths above 400 nm. An argon mini-arc discharge, with calibration traceable to NIST standards between 120 and 400 nm [35], was used for wavelengths below 400 nm. In order to calibrate the system using the argon discharge, a modification of the VUV system was required.…”
Section: Vuv Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For calibration in absolute intensity an Optronics OL550 Tungsten ribbon lamp was used for wavelengths above 400 nm. An argon mini-arc discharge, with calibration traceable to NIST standards between 120 and 400 nm [35], was used for wavelengths below 400 nm. In order to calibrate the system using the argon discharge, a modification of the VUV system was required.…”
Section: Vuv Spectrometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty bounds on the SPECAIR calculations correspond to the minimum and maximum values based upon the uncertainty in the temperature measurement. The uncertainty for the experimental value is estimated to be primarily from the reported uncertainty of the calibration source (±5%, [35]). The total uncertainty for the experimental value is estimated at ±6% or ± 36 mW/cm 2 /sr.…”
Section: Vuv Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include argon arcs (Bridges and Ott 1977), bare metal photoemissive diodes (Saloman 1978), D 2 lamps (Klose et al 1988), tungsten-filament incandescent lamps (Waters et al 1988), hollow-cathode (Danzmann et al 1988;Hollandt et al 1994) and Penning (Heise et al 1994) discharges, and silicon trap detectors (Goebel et al 1996) and photodiodes (Kuschnerus et al 1998;Canfield et al 1998). …”
Section: Transfer Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An examination of the errors in the various factors in Eqs. (1) and (2) indicates that the root-sum-squares error in R-1(X) is 15.1 percent. Combining this uncertainty with the uncertainty in the PMT current readings produces a final estimate 15.2 percent in the VUV continuum source radiance.…”
Section: Source Calibration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%