2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10933-012-9622-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric dating of recent sediments: beyond the boundary conditions

Abstract: Most mathematical models for radiometric dating of recent sediments are particular solutions of a unique physical problem: the advective-diffusive transport of a particle-bound radiotracer within a sediment profile that undergoes accretion. Regardless of the particular assumptions about fluxes, sedimentation rates and the diffusion term, all models assume ideal deposition as a boundary condition at the sediment water interface, i.e. new radioactive input will be deposited above the previously existing material… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2), (3) A linear combination of solutions for CF-CS and CMZ-CS with coefficients g and (1 − g), being g [0, 1] Abril et al (1992) SIT: sediment isotope tomography…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2), (3) A linear combination of solutions for CF-CS and CMZ-CS with coefficients g and (1 − g), being g [0, 1] Abril et al (1992) SIT: sediment isotope tomography…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of fallout radionuclides in studies of sediment, soil, and peat accumulation ( 7 Be, 137 Cs, 210 Pb, 241 Am) have been explored by a number of authors (Robbins and Edgington 1975;Münnich 1989, 1991;Urban et al 1990;Kaste, Heimsath, and Bostick 2007;Kaste et al 2011;Abril and Gharbi 2012;Kaste 2014, 2016;Shotyk et al 2015;Olid et al 2016;Davies et al 2018;Gonzalez-Meler et al 2018). The prior studies most relevant to the current study are those dealing with accumulation of soil and peat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases the behavior of the dissolved fraction of radionuclides requires handling separate equations for the dissolved and the particle-bound phases (Robbins and Jasinski, 1995;Abril and Gharbi, 2012). Almost all models assume ideal deposition as a boundary condition at the sediment water interface (SWI), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…new radioactive inputs will be deposited above the previously existing material. Abril and Gharbi (2012) have shown how this assumption may be unrealistic in sediment cores with very high porosities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%