1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf02164804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiometric determination of stability constants of mercury species complexes with L-cysteine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table 2) our determined constants are significantly lower than in these previous studies. 9,13,15,[17][18][19] Our experimental approach, based on a direct quantification of specific Hg were determined with comparably large number of data points covering extensive ranges in pH and ionic strength (Figure 1 and 2). The constants of Hg(SR)2 complexes were established with diverse types of LMM thiol containing multitude different functional groups ( Figure S1).…”
Section: Calculation Of Pka Values For Lmm Thiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Table 2) our determined constants are significantly lower than in these previous studies. 9,13,15,[17][18][19] Our experimental approach, based on a direct quantification of specific Hg were determined with comparably large number of data points covering extensive ranges in pH and ionic strength (Figure 1 and 2). The constants of Hg(SR)2 complexes were established with diverse types of LMM thiol containing multitude different functional groups ( Figure S1).…”
Section: Calculation Of Pka Values For Lmm Thiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 A similar magnitude of the stability constant for Hg II -LMM thiol complexes has been reported using a methodology in which the thermodynamics of the Hg II speciation are shifted towards a separable, identifiable, and measurable Hg II complex with the addition of a competing ligand such as iodide (I -) or bromide (Br -) ions or the lipophilic thiol dithizone. 9,[17][18][19] Even with this progress in methodological development it remains a challenge to determine the exceptionally high stability constant for Hg II -LMM thiol complexes, as exemplified by log β2 constants reported for the Hg(Cys)2 complex in recent literature, ranging between 38.2 9 and 43.5. 18 Thus, there is still a substantial uncertainty remaining before a consensus on Hg II -LMM thiols stability constants can be reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are low molecular weight (LMW) organic ligands with high affinities for Hg(II), 39,40 occurring in nanomolar to submicromolar concentrations in the environment. 41,42 However, the main reason for choosing cysteine and EDTA as model organic ligands was their wide application in experimental studies and their difference in Hg(II) complexation.…”
Section: Materials and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a decrease of the rate of PET The lower inhibitory effect of organomercury compounds on PET compared with HgCl 2 can be probably caused by the fact that the chemical affinity of organomercury for ligands, including amino acid residues in peptides, is similar to that of Hg 2+ but the stability constants of methylmercury complexes with these ligands are consistently lower than those of the corresponding Hg 2+ complexes [42]. This was confirmed by Stary and Kratzer [43] who found that mercury forms thiolate complexes exhibiting extraordinarily high formation constants. Whereas for HgCys 2 complexes this value was reported to be about 10 42 , similar formation constants for methylmercury and phenylmercury achieve only 10 15 and 10 16 , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%