2020
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.574228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomic Feature-Based Predictive Model for Microvascular Invasion in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to build and evaluate a radiomics feature-based model for the preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: A total of 145 patients were retrospectively included in the study pool, and the patients were divided randomly into two independent cohorts with a ratio of 7:3 (training cohort: n = 101, validation cohort: n = 44). For a pilot study of this predictive model another 18 patients were recruited into this study. A tota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
29
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The nomogram of MVI in HCC based on CT radiomics established by Peng et al [ 12 ] exhibited good decision-making efficiency (AUC = 0.84), which was slightly higher than the results of the present study, but the model did not involve the tumor diameter. In another study[ 13 ], the diagnostic efficacy of predicting MVI in a tumor diameter of ≤ 5 cm based on radiomics (the AUC for the verification and verification group was 0.637 and 0.583, respectively) was slightly lower than that of the present study. Compared to that study[ 13 ], the present study adopted more stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The nomogram of MVI in HCC based on CT radiomics established by Peng et al [ 12 ] exhibited good decision-making efficiency (AUC = 0.84), which was slightly higher than the results of the present study, but the model did not involve the tumor diameter. In another study[ 13 ], the diagnostic efficacy of predicting MVI in a tumor diameter of ≤ 5 cm based on radiomics (the AUC for the verification and verification group was 0.637 and 0.583, respectively) was slightly lower than that of the present study. Compared to that study[ 13 ], the present study adopted more stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…In another study[ 13 ], the diagnostic efficacy of predicting MVI in a tumor diameter of ≤ 5 cm based on radiomics (the AUC for the verification and verification group was 0.637 and 0.583, respectively) was slightly lower than that of the present study. Compared to that study[ 13 ], the present study adopted more stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. Moreover, the present study only included solitary liver cancer with a diameter of ≤ 5 cm.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…The systematic literature search initially yielded 188 records from the four databases. After removing 82 duplicates, 50 inappropriate types of publications, and 34 ineligible studies, a total of 22 studies were included in this systematic review [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ] ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although practice varies between treatment centers, many lines of evidence suggest that the best method for detection of liver metastases from CRC are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (9). For lesions with a diameter of less than 10 mm, MRI is a more sensitive modality than CT (10,11), and specifically in hepatobiliary MRI with specific contrast enhancers (such as gadoxetate), showing a higher accuracy of lesion detection (12)(13)(14)(15). Many studies have investigated the optimal modality for imaging hepatic metastases, finding pooled sensitivity on a per-lesion basis of 88% for MRI, 74% for CT, and 79% for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (9,(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%