2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomics diagnostic performance in predicting lymph node metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Zanyar HajiEsmailPoor,
Zana Kargar,
Peyman Tabnak
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These complexities are often not extensively covered in quality assessment tools. In line with our study, meta-analyses conducted on other clinical contexts have similarly identified methodological limitations in their included studies 58 , 59 , 61 , 66 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These complexities are often not extensively covered in quality assessment tools. In line with our study, meta-analyses conducted on other clinical contexts have similarly identified methodological limitations in their included studies 58 , 59 , 61 , 66 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“… 58 conducted a meta-analysis showing the performance of CT-based radiomics models predicting LNM in gastric cancer, with an impressive AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81–0.86). Similarly, in their study on papillary thyroid carcinoma 59 , radiomics models exhibited a notable AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73, 0.85), which closely aligns with the outcomes of our study in CRC.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These distinctions in radiomic processes yield distinct sets of features, complicating direct comparisons between studies ( 47 ). The superiority of PyRadiomics compared to other feature extraction software has also been mentioned in a previous meta-analysis ( 48 ). Lastly, using a Ki-67 cut-off of 14% could also cause interstudy heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Threshold effect was analyzed by the Spearman correlation coefficient (r), which was calculated between the logit of the true positive rate and the false positive rate. 13 When p > 0.05, the threshold effect can be ignored when analyzing the source of heterogeneity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%