2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomics in Head and Neck Radiation Therapy: Impact of Metal Artifact Reduction

Abstract: Conclusion: The interobserver variation of target volumes delineation of OPC patient based on MR is large. For the GTV, volume differences up to a factor of 10 were observed. For the CTV, differences up to of factor of 8 were observed.This demonstrates the need for international MR delineation guidelines for oropharyngeal cancer patients treated using MR-guided radiotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods commonly reduce the impact of DAs by interpolating voxel HUs within the image sinogram (Abdoli et al 2010), but research is also being done to salvage image signal using deep learning methods (Zhang and Yu 2018, Huang et al 2018, Hu et al 2019. Although these methods are designed to reduce the qualitative impact of the artifact, it is possible for new artifacts to be generated in the image that mitigate its benefits in fields such as radiomics (Block et al 2016). In the future, a classification model, such as the one presented in this paper, could determine whether these methods are effectively removing the DA prior to utilizing the data for other purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods commonly reduce the impact of DAs by interpolating voxel HUs within the image sinogram (Abdoli et al 2010), but research is also being done to salvage image signal using deep learning methods (Zhang and Yu 2018, Huang et al 2018, Hu et al 2019. Although these methods are designed to reduce the qualitative impact of the artifact, it is possible for new artifacts to be generated in the image that mitigate its benefits in fields such as radiomics (Block et al 2016). In the future, a classification model, such as the one presented in this paper, could determine whether these methods are effectively removing the DA prior to utilizing the data for other purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study accounted for the fact that artifacts from metal dental fillings are known to encumber target delineation and subsequent radiomics analysis [59,60]. For this purpose, the presence of visible dental 1 artifacts effect anywhere in the slices that encompassed 'ORN' or 'Control' VOIs at any time point precluded the integration of this scan and hence the patient's data as an input to the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, head and neck radiomics are subject to the effects of image artifacts from intrinsic patient factors, such as metal dental implants and bone. The effects of resulting streak artifacts and beam-hardening artifacts on robustness of extracted radiomics features have been reported ( 3 , 40 ). Our approach within this study was to remove slices of the GTV on computed tomography that were affected by artifacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%