2020
DOI: 10.18053/jctres.06.2020s4.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiomics in lung cancer for oncologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in line with previous literature that has demonstrated tumor heterogeneity in CT and PET to be associated with progression and treatment failure. 11,[26][27][28][29] The most common models used in radiomic studies for time-to-event analysis are the Cox proportional hazards and RSF models. RSF models have been shown to provide comparable results to Cox models and have been used to predict distant metastases and risk stratify lung cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are in line with previous literature that has demonstrated tumor heterogeneity in CT and PET to be associated with progression and treatment failure. 11,[26][27][28][29] The most common models used in radiomic studies for time-to-event analysis are the Cox proportional hazards and RSF models. RSF models have been shown to provide comparable results to Cox models and have been used to predict distant metastases and risk stratify lung cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the continuous development of artificial intelligence, radiomics, as a noninvasive imaging tool, plays a nonnegligible role in the diagnosis and clinical management of cancer [ 12 ]. Radiomics can extract numerous quantitative features from medical images with high throughput and apply automatic or semiautomatic analysis methods to transform imaging data into mineable data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%