1982
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.139.1.49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radionuclide bone scanning of osteosarcoma: falsely extended uptake patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several authors [2,27,28] have been using bone scan as an index for detecting the correct extent of the lesion, in order to ensure adequate surgical resection, others have shown that an "extended uptake" occurred beyond the proven limits of focal bone destruction [29][30][31]. In our case, two false positive uptakes which had occurred due to corresponding dental infections were correctly identified when BS was correlated with PR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although several authors [2,27,28] have been using bone scan as an index for detecting the correct extent of the lesion, in order to ensure adequate surgical resection, others have shown that an "extended uptake" occurred beyond the proven limits of focal bone destruction [29][30][31]. In our case, two false positive uptakes which had occurred due to corresponding dental infections were correctly identified when BS was correlated with PR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Blood flow increase and hyperemia is frequently seen in these cases and blood flow increase is of diagnostic value in differentiation of malignity on bone scintigraphy. 26 In some cases, blood flow increase and hyperemia can be the only warning sign on bone scan and even no significant osteoblastic activity retention may be detected on late phase bone scan. 27 Our case was also an example for showing the value of blood flow increase and hyperemia in differentiating malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, 18F-FDG-PET or PET/CT would appear to have a complementary role to conventional staging procedures (Cook et al, 2010;as cited in Kleis et al, 2009, Kneisl et al, 2006and Völker et al, 2007. After a diagnosis of a malignant primary bone lesion is made, the use of bone scintigraphy to define the extent of tumor before surgical resection is controversial: good correlation between increased bone tracer uptake and true anatomical extent that has been reported (Cook et al, 2010;as cited in Goldmann et al, 1975, McKillop et al, 1981, and Papanicolou et al, 1982, has not been supported by other studies (Chew & Hudson, 1982). These discrepancies may be due to peritumoral reactive changes overestimating extent or underestimations due to inability to detect marrow and soft-tissue involvement.…”
Section: Soft Tissue Tumors and Primary Malignant Bone Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%