2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12410-017-9425-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radionuclide Imaging of Infective Endocarditis: State of Art and Future Perspective

Abstract: Purpose of Review Infectious endocarditis is a serious disease requiring rapid diagnosis and accurate risk stratification to offer the best therapeutic strategy. Infection of prosthetic valve (PV) and cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) is increasing due to the ageing of the population and the growing number of implants. Foreign material infection remains clinically challenging given the limitation of ultrasound techniques in this context whereas the diagnosis must be precocious. Recent Finding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT is 15% higher than echocardiography for cardiac devices (6% for prosthetic valves), and 58% lower for native valves ( Guenther et al, 2015 ; Dell’Aquila et al, 2016 ; Fagman et al, 2016 ; Granados et al, 2016 ; Memmott et al, 2016 ; Salomäki et al, 2017 ; Sánchez-Enrique et al, 2018 ; Calais et al, 2019 ; de Camargo et al, 2019 ; Abikhzer et al, 2020 ; Gomes et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Besides the poor detection accuracy in NVE, this imaging modality has possible false-negatives in patients with small biofilms, possible false-positives concerning early post-surgical prosthetic valve implantation ( Rosenbaum et al, 2006 ) or when active thrombi, cardiac tumors, and atrial fibrillation are present, a complex preparation protocol, and limited availability in peripheral centers ( Marchetta et al, 2017 ). Current guidelines stipulate that [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT should only be considered for IE diagnosis when > 3 months have elapsed after valve implantation to prevent false positives from artefacts following surgery ( Habib et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT is 15% higher than echocardiography for cardiac devices (6% for prosthetic valves), and 58% lower for native valves ( Guenther et al, 2015 ; Dell’Aquila et al, 2016 ; Fagman et al, 2016 ; Granados et al, 2016 ; Memmott et al, 2016 ; Salomäki et al, 2017 ; Sánchez-Enrique et al, 2018 ; Calais et al, 2019 ; de Camargo et al, 2019 ; Abikhzer et al, 2020 ; Gomes et al, 2020 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). Besides the poor detection accuracy in NVE, this imaging modality has possible false-negatives in patients with small biofilms, possible false-positives concerning early post-surgical prosthetic valve implantation ( Rosenbaum et al, 2006 ) or when active thrombi, cardiac tumors, and atrial fibrillation are present, a complex preparation protocol, and limited availability in peripheral centers ( Marchetta et al, 2017 ). Current guidelines stipulate that [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT should only be considered for IE diagnosis when > 3 months have elapsed after valve implantation to prevent false positives from artefacts following surgery ( Habib et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%