1982
DOI: 10.2307/3808405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radionuclides in Pronghorn Resulting from Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Worldwide Fallout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study on the INL Site from 1972-1976 conservatively estimated the potential whole-body dose that could be received from an individual eating the entire muscle (27,000 g [952 oz]) and liver mass (500 g [17.6 oz]) of an antelope with the highest levels of radioactivity found in these animals. This dose was 2.7 mrem (27 μSv) (Markham et al 1982). Game animals collected at the INL Site during the past few years have generally shown much lower concentrations of radionuclides.…”
Section: Big Game Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study on the INL Site from 1972-1976 conservatively estimated the potential whole-body dose that could be received from an individual eating the entire muscle (27,000 g [952 oz]) and liver mass (500 g [17.6 oz]) of an antelope with the highest levels of radioactivity found in these animals. This dose was 2.7 mrem (27 μSv) (Markham et al 1982). Game animals collected at the INL Site during the past few years have generally shown much lower concentrations of radionuclides.…”
Section: Big Game Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study on the INL Site from 1972-1976 conservatively estimated the potential whole-body dose that could be received from an individual eating the entire muscle (27,000 g [952 oz]) and liver mass (500 g [17.6 oz]) of an antelope with the highest levels of radioactivity found in these animals. This dose was 2.7 mrem (27 μSv) (Markham et al 1982) 137 Cs or other human-made radionuclides. Therefore, no dose from human-made radionuclides would be associated with the consumption of these animals.…”
Section: Big Game Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monitoring of radionuclide levels outside the boundaries of the various INEL facilities and off the INEL site has detected radionuclide concentrations above background levels in individual plants VOLUME1,APPENDIXB 4.9-2 and animals (Markham 1974;Craig et al 1979;Markham et al 1982;Morris 1993a), but these limited data suggest that populations of exposed animals (e.g., mice and rabbits) as well as animals that feed on these exposed animals (e.g., eagles and hawks) are not at risk.…”
Section: Floramentioning
confidence: 99%